• MCk3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You said there’s nuance but then went on to explain that there isn’t nuance and the only reasonable vote is for Biden. And you’re not wrong. There are a lot of folks pretending to be on the left acting like there’s a whole lot of nuance here, and that voting for someone other than Biden, or not voting at all, is an acceptable option.

    None of this precludes advocating for your positions or doing other praxis, but when it comes to voting the answer is clear

    • Cowbee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s nuance, because leftists saying voting isn’t going to change anything meaningfully as far as moving towards the left is still true.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is true, but not voting or casting a protest vote right now ensures fascism, under which there will be literally no choice at all.

        At least under a democracy there are chances to improve things, like replacing FPTP with a better voting system that will actually allow the left a seat at the table. That’s already happening in some places and there’s a movement (supported by democrats and vehemently opposed by republicans) to enact alternative voting methods.

        Unfortunately there’s been so much apathy for decades that the fascists have got their foot solidly in the door. There was nuance years ago, but we squandered it. There’s little point debating left vs liberal when fascism has taken hold. That must be stopped first.

        There’s no such thing as moral neutrality in this environment, and as much as it sucks, not voting against fascism is the same as voting for fascism.

        • Cowbee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Hence my original point, leftists must vote for liberals, even if it isn’t ever going to improve the system, and must work themselves to build up leftist structures without hoping for help from liberals. If they don’t vote, then fascists take power, and leftists lose the chance to build leftist structures at all.

          I do think you’re too hopeful that a 2 party Capitalist state designed to change as little as possible would meaningfully improve from within, rather than under pressure from without, but it would be great if you were right about that.

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m not that hopeful that the left can change the system from within, to be honest, I’m just certain it’s too late to think about that because under fascist rule, not only will things not improve, but many of us will face genocide.

            The time for leftist change was 20 years ago, or with any luck, 8 or so years from now after the fascist threat has been quashed. Right now we have to think about unifying like it’s 1932.

            • Cowbee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Only thing I disagree with is the idea that leftist change was more possible 20 years ago, Capitalism’s instability and inherent structural flaws only make themselves more apparent and severe as time goes on, and with that comes potential for change. The left is larger than ever before, and is constantly growing.

        • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s already happening in some places and there’s a movement (supported by democrats and vehemently opposed by republicans) to enact alternative voting methods.

          Where? And who in the DNC supports this?

          • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Here.

            And here’s one resource to support it. There are many others, both local and national.

            eta: I’m on mobile so searching and linking is hard, but you can find people running for office who support these efforts by googling the office (senator, mayor, or whatever) and ‘free vote initiative’ or some synonyms. There are some (mostly local) republicans, substantially more democrats, and a huge majority of 3rd party candidates for obvious reasons).

            I strongly recommend bringing it up with your representatives. 3rd party and democrats have been teaming up for this, and republicans have been fighting it because FPTP greatly benefits them and they know it.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Unfortunately there’s been so much apathy for decades that the fascists have got their foot solidly in the door.

          That apathy has been earned.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        So is the illusion of being able to shift the Overton window in any way more important than saving your supporters from genocide?

        • Cowbee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Reread the original comment. It’s absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you’re never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.

          Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.

            • Cowbee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Reread the original comment. It’s absolutely important to vote as loss prevention, but you’re never going to get meaningful systemic change towards the left via voting.

              Vote to protect, actually make grassroots movements like unionizing and organizing to move to the left.

                • Cowbee@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Both are important, and you don’t get to only pick one. You can do both, prevent fascism and genocide, while also building up leftist structures like unions and networks of mutual aid.

                  That’s like asking you if you’re going to wipe your ass after you shit or wash your hands, and saying you can only pick 1. This is the absolute dumbest “would you rather” and should be ignored and tossed in the trash.

                  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    17
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    In the real world, you can only get one. So have some courage to be honest about what you’re really saying and choose:

                    A) Shift the Overton window to the left, which will 100% guarantee Trump gets re-elected with the murder of millions

                    B) Vote for a Democrat which will keep Trump out of office and save millions of lives, but keep the Overton window center-right for the rest of the decade

                    Pick one. I dare you to truly be honest and do it.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I suppose it might look that way if you aren’t a minority or a woman or gay. If nothing meaningful has changed in the last 100 years, then we could go back to the policies of the 1900s-1920s without any difference. And I very much doubt anyone wants to do that, because there are very big differences.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The things that did change did not start with voting. Especially because women couldn’t vote to get the right to vote.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                So they started with the liberal framework of free expression and ended with voting? Good point I guess.

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  That’s how democracy works… ? Where do you think the issues come from that wind up on the ballot?

                  e: sorry if I’m missing sarcasm.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just don’t know why the Onus is never on Joe Biden himself. Why is it that we feel like he doesn’t have to earn any votes at all?

      “Am I so out of touch? No, it’s the voters who are wrong.”

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        “Am I so out of touch? No, it’s the voters who are wrong.”

        No, it’s more like “LOL you have to vote for me, or the fascist will win”. Democrats love opponents like Trump, because he helps them fundraise like crazy.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It also means they don’t have to do shit but be second worst to a literal fascist. And it’s disgusting how comfortable they are in such a position.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The onus isn’t on him because voting for him is for our benefit

          It’s to our lesser detriment. There’s a difference.

    • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Voting for someone other than Biden or not voting is an absolutely acceptable option, and I’m not pretending to be a leftist when I do so. I have Ranked Choice Voting in my state, but even if I didn’t, I would vote for who I most want in office because I have no faith in either democrats or republicans to fix the most important issues currently plaguing 99% of the people. Vilifying people for voting third party — when third parties are currently the only viable presidential and congressional solution apart from a violent revolution — is misguided.

      Democrats are not your friends; you deserve better.

      • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Non voters vote too. They vote for ‘I’ll have what she’s having.’ then they complain when she chooses shit.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Leftist 3rd parties split votes between leftists and the more conservative liberals (who are the vast majority), increasing the chance of a Republican victory. I fully support right-wing people voting Libertarian though :)

        With the politics of the U.S. population, and violent revolution would likely be fascist.

        • Diotima@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just a random note: Most proper libertarians (not those weird tea party fucks) make Democrats look positively authoritarian on social issues. Economics, no, but social? Absolutely.

          • 31337@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            True. I considered myself a libertarian when I was in high school (mostly for cannabis legalization and guns, lol). Then, some of my first job experiences were pretty bad (persistent wage theft on multiple jobs, an owner coercing sex from minors, etc), and started becoming more of a leftist.

            • Diotima@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I get that. Libertarians have a bad habit of downplaying economic hardship by saying that markets will solve themselves. Maybe there’s a world in which that might work, but it isn’t this one.

              I do think that some progressive influencers know that the DNC is much closer to the GOP on social issues. Attacking libertarians is, in my opinion, a calculated lie designed to distract from that fact.

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Tell me you don’t understand math & game theory without telling me you don’t understand math & game theory.