• TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is pretty ingenious (and evil) the way they made the Chromium logo look like the shitty off-brand diet version of Chrome.

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Completely ignoring Chrome’s success is off the back of it being advertised on the world’s most popular website since it’s release, then yeah.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And it being installed with unrelated software as crapware, and Google adopting Microsoft’s “Youtube isn’t done until Firefox doesn’t run”…

          • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I can’t figure out what Opera’s deal is now, with that weird video enhancement thing. Lucid, or whatever it’s called.

            ABSOLUTELY NOBODY asked for in-browser video sharpening.

            How much development time and expertise does that kind of thing take, anyway? Whatever the fuck Lucid Video actually does, it must have taken thousands of person-hours to develop, of which many hundreds were contributed by people with Masters-degree levels of education and experience, in image processing.

            Why, in the name of all that is good and holy in this misbegotten, shit-crusted world would they spend all that effort on that shit, INSTEAD OF MAKING THEIR OWN BROWSER ENGINE AGAIN???

            That would HAVE to be easier, right? Maybe it would be pretty hard, given the commitment you’d have to make, in order to be absolutely sure you were making a product that didn’t have huge security holes. But I’m just saying, NOBODY wanted whatever this Lucid Video thing is. At least just save all the effort of doing that, by just…not doing it.

              • Chill Dude 69@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                Also, nobody:

                Also, Opera: Every couple of times that the browser auto-updates itself, it plays a splash screen with a weirdly ominous and loud noise. You’re welcome. We knew you’d love that.

                • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Its such a horrendously cheesy marketing gimmick, and people still somehow fall for it. Like sure, it has some actual features like ram limiter or whatever, but when is that every necessary? I keep around a hundred tabs open across two different browsers (yeah, I’m a weirdo like that) on my 12 year old thinkpad and it works fine, surely a GAMING computer running any other browser would be able to keep up without having to set artificial resource limits?

                  Also, did you know that Opera has an official vtuber? Because apparently that’s also what all the cool kids are into these days

            • ares35@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              opera isn’t opera anymore, it’s chinese-owned now (since 2016). if you want a browser by one of the original founders of the ‘old’ opera, look at vivaldi… although it, too, is chromium-based.

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I wonder if chromium having the blue colors is what set the precedent for almost every other privacy-conscious browser to have a blue logo (Waterfox, GNU Icecat, palemoon, librewolf…)

      EDIT on second though probably not, blue just seems like a good color for internet-related applications. Safari, edge, and internet explorer are also blue!

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        For years I’ve seen blue as a social media color and stayed away. A beautiful peaceful color ruined by Facebook and its ilk

          • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            The color palette of fortune 100 companies seem to be, in order of frequency: Blue, Red, and White (not counting negative space).

            I think that there was some study that found that these colors are the most impactful or some shit.

            • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I remember hearing that in pokemon go, you could choose to join one of three teams or whatever (blue, yellow, and red). And the blue one was by far the most popular one, despite there being no difference besides color.

      • yggdar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        As others already said, Chromium definitely isn’t the first or only one to use a blue logo. There is a theory that colours influence the way we perceive a brand, for example this article explains that idea.

        Blue is supposed to convey trustworthiness and maturity. A lot of companies like that, so you tend to see a lot of blue.

        You may also be experiencing the frequency illusion. If you specifically noticed the blue in Chromium’s logo, it would make sense that you suddenly started noticing the blue in other logos as well!

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel like just more app icons in general are blue than any other color. Off the top of my head in addition to what you mentioned I have shazam, venmo, signal, steam, blink, reolink, dropbox, steam, paypal, discord, max, disney plus. And that’s not even counting one’s that are majority white but with blue as the only color. I think it’s just the most popular design choice or maybe there’s some sinister market research somewhere that shows people use/spend more on apps that have blue icons.

        • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I believe blue is a very “Everything is okay” colour. Which might explain why it’s so common if true.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      And no API keys included on the Windows version of Chromium…

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lynx gang!

        (Edit: love it that somebody gave me a downvote for mentioning the Lynx browser)

        • Dicska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Alright, 10 bucks for the first developer that makes a YouTube ASCII art plugin for Lynx.

          • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Have you played with caca in vlc? I wouldn’t know how to get into lynx but it seems it’s most of the way there. % vlc --vout caca video.ogg

            • Dicska@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I was kind of joking, but the serious part came from the time I worked at an office with strict browsing rules, so I had to resort to lynx to avoid suspicion. I know an ASCII art video wouldn’t look innocent anyway, but I was just simply thinking if it’s possible at all particularly in lynx.

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Hey there based lynx user! I’ve been thinking of switching to lynx (or w3m or similar) for reading text-heavy websites like documentation and blogs and stuff, but I find it really annoying how in every terminal browser that I tried, the text stretches across the entire screen. It’s kind of annoying reading such long lines, at least for me. Do you know if lynx (or any other terminal browser) has some sort of option to set a maximum width for web pages?

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s been over a decade since I last used Lynx, only really mentioned it because it’s cool, if not very practical in this day and age of GUIs.

            So the short answers is “no”.

            Sorry.

      • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        59
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d rather use spyware than that piece of garbage. So many things are missing or broken. Ik it’s smaller and open source but that doesn’t mean it’s the best solution. I’m waiting for arc to come out on Windows.

        • hswolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          FF is a perfectly good browser with as many features as any other.

          Even has pioneered some of them like the picture-in-picture that lets you overlay videos.

          Could you provide specifics on why you don’t like It? Or what’s “broken”?

          • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s a lot of things but especially that of developer tools. They are horrible and I often run into many things going wrong when using it such as elements not showing at all and weird versions of errors showing in the console. It also has issues with site compatibility from a development standpoint. Many commonly used Web standards (as shown by mozillas own documentation) are just not present on Firefox. I remember there being complaints over Microsoft teams or YouTube not working on Firefox. People blamed Microsoft and Google, but it was actually mozillas fault for not adding standard web elements and JavaScript functions.

            • hswolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I agree with the developer tools take, they are sometimes unresponsive and difficult to read or analyse, especially snapshots.

              Now, I have to disagree about the web standards, all major current browsers are W3C compliant, and developing under those guidelines is an interchangeable operation between browsers.

              But of course, this a market, and browsers will one-up one another for a higher market share. Google for example has been pushing forward almost a new set of guidelines for Chrome, which has a gigantic market share; and those, while widely used, are not the norm, they should be namespaces, we as developers are bound to have to deal with these edge cases unfortunately.

              I understand where the frustration is coming from, Mozilla isn’t a saint, but with the current state of browsers, you can’t possibly say that Firefox is a bad choice, overall It does everything a modern browser is supposed to do.

              I’d even say it’s a better option now than It has ever been.

              • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But still why would I want to use it? Even if it’s Google’s fault that things don’t work, things still don’t work. I’m not going to use something worse because there might be “spyware” in chrome. Which by the way, is just them collecting data for themselves, not selling data like face book or tiktok does.

        • Skipcast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 months ago

          What’s broken and missing exactly? Everything works fine for me except experimental features such as webgpu for example

          • not_again@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Named tab groups.

            Don’t get me wrong…I still use FF on Linux, but this is the one thing I miss…and the extension don’t seem to work as well as native groups…

    • vinhill@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually, what is the reason that Firefox seems to be preferred over Chromium? Is it the license? The control Alphabet has over it?

      One has to agree that there is a lot more money poured into chromium, the code is more modern and easier embeddable, it is more feature-complete.

      Though, it’s good to have two independent browser engines and a non-profit (+for-profit subsidiary) dedicated to a free, open, user-focussed browser.

      • Senshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Which still is based on Firefox, like down if other great derivatives. All of those are great, and mostly up to personal preference.

        The important step is to get people out of the chromium universe in the first place. Sadly, Google puts their poison in at the well (=chromium), so a lot of formerly fantastic chromium-based secure and private browsers are now failing.

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t blame the users here, remember from 2008 to 2012 where chrome ads where plastered on every website. Google knew what it was doing spreading its Trojan horse. I wouldn’t have known about the existence of chromium if I wasn’t lurking of privacy forums, blame google this time.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Back then chrome was useful tho. Faster than any competition.

      Now, while it’s still fast, it’s so. Fekkin. Hungry.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I want my browser to be hungry. I’d rather have it using the memory for sites than have the sites reload when I switch tabs. I want it to be fast on all things.

        This is not exclusive to Chrome. No matter what I use, I want it to be running from RAM and not have to swap or reload anything. Even things on my phone. I absolutely hate when I’m in the middle of multitasking on my phone and I go back to some information and the app has been unloaded and needs to load from scratch again (sometimes requiring a login to view the information I had previously retrieved).

        That being said, I load everything I own up with about as much RAM as I can, and I buy devices with more RAM than I think I’ll need. Generally when considering an upgrade to my current cellphone, I’m looking at the RAM of the new phone and considering if the increased amount justifies the work and cost involved with changing phones (if there’s an increase at all). Since RAM will be the most significant factor in whether or not something can keep up with me.

        My main PC has 64G, my laptop has 32G, and I believe right now, my current phone has 8G. It may be time to upgrade my phone…

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve been thinking about upgrading. I have room to increase the memory on my main system, and my laptop. I can easily double both…

            I believe my main system will support upwards of 1.5TB of RAM in specific configurations. I likely would not exceed 256GB. Beyond that and even the best CPUs for my system probably wouldn’t be able to support enough processes to really take advantage of it. Even now I’m more concerned about CPU speed in my main rig than I am about RAM. I’ll probably pick up something with faster cores soon.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I…wow…whew…my PC has 12gb…you’re scary my man…

          A-anyway, I believe browsers shouldn’t be that hungry…

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Don’t be scared. I’m rarely over 32GB of use. I mainly have it for when I need to do some virtualization/lab work.

            Even when I do labs though, I usually debate whether to run them local or put them on my home server with 256GB of RAM.

            Edit to add: since I have the memory, I’d rather that chrome uses it for useful stuff. No point in having the memory if it’s just going to sit vacant most of the time. I already bought the RAM, so I might as well use it.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        It wasn’t, people were using out dated explorer versions and up to date Chrome was faster

        Luckily Microsoft learned from Google that you can’t leave updates up to the user

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s like a little trophy that we get the privilege of using as a reward for mastering GIMP’s admittedly beginner-hostile interface

  • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    when i was in high school chrome had lots of school restrictions but chromium didnt. life saver for me, guy who did nothing in high school

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Schools IT departments all over the world are doing society a massive favor by indirectly teaching children how to bypass censorship. 80% of what I know about IP and NAT came from finding different ways to bypass my school’s firewall haha

      • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        one of my ways of bypassing the schools block on reddit was so stupidly easy

        ssl error comes up trying to go to reddit. delete ssl from the link bar (cant remember its name) and boom reddit works

  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Or use Firefox, a browser not made by the same guys who want to create a monopoly on web browsers.

      • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, but they do a lot of good stuff for the open internet, and they respect user freedom and privacy. Unlike Google, they allow you to use proper adblockers and don’t want to screw you over with this MV3 bullshit.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Well they marketed it heavily and this is the result.

    Also no one is a loser for using a piece of software.

    • diffcalculus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unless it’s Chrome or Windows. According to some folks, you might as well end it all now.

  • woodgen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good luck finding a Chromium build for non Linux based systems. Not that I would be affected by that.

      • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are you currently using ungoogled chromium? How is it? Last time I took a look at it, it seemed sort of abandoned. Is it being maintained again?

        • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The only thing stopping ungoogled chromium from really kicking off is an open source webstore alternative. Think Eclipse’s Open-VSX for community vscode builds.

        • EP51L0N@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          last commit was 5 days ago, so I’d say it’s still up and running. I use it as an alternative for sites that don’t work great with firefox

          • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Good to know, thanks! I currently use the flatpak version of my preferred browser for extra security (the sandbox could in theory limit the damage done by zerodays, also in theory limits fingerprinting because things like custom fonts are not available inside the sandbox), but unfortunately that breaks previewing/debugging local html files that reference other local files (e.g. images), so I was looking for a nice and simple browser to install natively just for that purpose.

  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love how the Chrome logo is literally a camera shutter looking at you, with Chromium the same but in camo. Really gets the message across.

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Huh? Wasn’t this always how this template looked like? I found it by ducking (is that what we call it?) “elmo cocaine meme template”, meanwhile “coockie monster cocaine meme template” returns nothing relevant…

      EDIT: Are you making a joke about cookies that I am too dumb to understand?

      • fouloleron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve never seen the meme before, my bad. I thought it was supposed to be cookie monster munching, not Elmo snorting!

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh haha no worries. I myself have never watched a ful episode of whatever show these characters are from (Sesame street? was that what it was called?) so I thought you were referencing some lore I didn’t know haha

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s because the chrome and chromium icons are circles, like cookies. You also put a “bite mark” in the chrome icon, as if bit off like a cookie.

  • itscozydownhere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I tried to download Chromium but it’s a mess. No way a regular user will be able to download and install it. The will to do it will fade pretty quickly

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Firefox doesn’t fucking work with my daughter’s online school. This is a national school that multiple states are adopting as a state online school (meaning it is a public school and we don’t have to pay tuition) and we have to use Chrome because I can’t get it to work in Firefox and I hate Edge. Even worse, a bunch of materials from the school either don’t mention which browser to use or specifically say you can use either Firefox or Chrome. I spent like half an hour trying to figure out why it wasn’t working. I did updates, resets, anything I could think of, until my wife texted me and said maybe it has to be in Chrome. And yep, that worked.

        Of course, the school is run by Pearson, and they’re evil, so they probably have a deal with Google anyway.

        • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Damn, that sucks. I have always been keeping my school/university stuff in a separate browser, so maybe your daughter can use something like Ungoogled Chromium for school and Firefox for everything else.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ll look into it eventually, but we had to do this at the last minute because we had to get school started and she gets annoyed when I try to do anything on the notebook while she’s around.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s that easy on Windows as well, depending on the package manager you prefer the commands are

        Winget (native)

        winget install -e --id Hibbiki.Chromium

        Chocolatey (third party)

        choco install chromium-stable

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Winget is awesome! It’s nice to see Microsoft finally focusing on adding basic quality-of-life features to their OS. First there was Windows Terminal, then proper bash support with WSL, and now package management with Winget! To be fair, it’s not 100% there yet. Tried installing ffmpeg with winget recently, and it took like three times longer than apt-get would have. But hey, better than downloading EXE’s from some random website. Really excited for what they’ll add next. Who knows, maybe Windows will finally be a viable desktop OS some day!

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I prefer my pacman being able to cd to a directory and install there rather than winget’s “-location direct path” but yeah Linux is faster and better for tech illiterate people like myself

    • pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Flatpak (and flathub.org) has been a lifesaver for this, I use Ungoogled Chromium. Of course only for the few broken shitty websites that I’m forced to use