At SUSE, the principles of open source and power of collaboration are dear to us.
That’s pretty rich coming from a company that sold out the Linux community to Microsoft when they tried to patent troll Linux into oblivion…
Edit: holy shit autocorrect I’m trying to write patent, not pattern or parent
What happened? Source?
I don’t know of any source that condenses a decade+ of this bs.
In the early 2000s ms got a shit load of patents that Linux and later android were supposedly infringing on, and so they demanded that distro companies, hardware manufacturers, and basically everyone using Linux commercially pay them royalties. Every distro was holding their ground since it was obvious patent trolling.
Novell (owners of suse at the time and creators of opensuse) saw it as an opportunity to catch up to redhat. So they made a deal with Ballmer (the dude that called Linux a cancer only fit for communists) that they’ll confirm they’re infringing those patents and that they’ll pay them royalties on every sale because of that. In return they won’t get sued and they’ll be promoted by ms.
One of the oldest commercial distros admitting that Linux is infringing on those patents gave ms a leg to stand on and bully every other distro.
Later on they renewed their deal with ms, and started selling them certificates. The purpose of those was to protect ms customers using Linux from getting fucked by ms trying to fuck Linux. Even later on Novell died, suse got purchased again, and ms bought some of their patents.
This lasted from like 2006 to 2018, and in the end ms realized they can’t get to extinguishing before first embracing and extending. So they open sourced their 60k patents (suse got sold again after this). Now they’re using Canonical to finish what they’ve started.
Like yeah, they’re under new management as an independent entity now, but I’d wait a bit more before calling them some beacon of FOSS values.
Does SUSE have a public source repo for their enterprise products? I know Leap exists but I believe it is near bug-for-bug without being an exact clone like Alma and Rocky were going for or old CentOS was (Leap also isn’t a commercial competitor like CIQ was setting up with Rocky).
Not that they need to have a public repo, nor does Red Hat, just out of curiosity. The largest issue I see with the Red Hat change is their stance on redistribution by subscribers, without it a subscriber could share the sources as the GPL seems to pretty clearly intend. I don’t know the SUSE TOS but I would hope it doesn’t have such restrictions, even if Leap is enough to satisfy people who don’t want to pay for support. The tone of this posting makes them sound much more permissive.
Tbh that article seems like a sales pitch more than analysis of Red Hat’s licensing changes.
TLDR: We don’t do that.
They’re trying to take some of the cake that RH might lose in this. That’s OK too I guess, as long as they have no plans to shift directions as well.
