• tango_octogono@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The TL;DR is that they don’t want random organizations to try to geoengineer when we still are not sure about unintended consequences

      The article talks about a start up company trying to reflect the sun

  • Jummit@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Funny, I was just reading The Ministry for the Future…

    TLDR: It’s going to be seriously discussed as adaptation measure as soon as we recognize that the situation is beyond repair.

  • Hari Seldon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This time I’m not on the same side with the EU, I think that an experiment won’t hurt anything. If it doesn’t work, we’ll know that this is not the right way, but if does, we might have new tool for managing climate change.

    • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally wrong and the limitation is that you need a allowance to test stuff for safety reasons, it can be very dangerous, especially since the chemicals used for it are usually not exactly chemicals you want in your body, also there is no proof that these things don’t make it worse.

      • Panamanap@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Examples from the past/present:

        • lead in gasoline and paint
        • fluorocarbons in refrigerants / ozone depletion
        • microplastic/fluorocarbons that decay too slow (ongoing debate)
      • Hari Seldon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The experiment would require very few amount of chemicals (~1Kg) that aren’t dangerous to humans. It would have nearly zero impact overall.

        • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just a bit of lead wich isn’t harmful to humans -scientist in the 40s making “better” fuel and paint…