• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Another site in which “accidentally” the GdpR cookie forms weirdly aren’t scrollable so you can’t reject them

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m pretty sure the form is there exactly because GDPR needs it to be.

        Also I’m not villanising it, I’m villanising the corporations who only pretend to comply.

        How does GDPR affect EU cookie law?

        Recital 30 of the General Data Protection Regulation considers cookies as part of personal data. It requires websites and web publishers to obtain valid consent when collecting personal data from users. Therefore, the GDPR and Cookie Law work in tandem in the European Union

        • RatBin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          This particular instance of a cookie notice is really bad. The gdpr is there for a reason and a lot of websites can come up with better solutions to that cookie law.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, my point exactly.

            This one sucks.

            I like the option of opting out, and way too many websites uses shenanigans to get you to accept implicitly or explicitly. And even when you don’t they hide “legitimate interest” checkmarks everywhere and you have to scroll a 100 miles to do them.

            I still do.

            But sites in which you can’t even scroll to see the “refuse” bit? Haiyaaaaaa

      • Scrollone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I hate cookie banners, but I’m not villanizing the cookie law; I’m villanizing all the websites that try to spy on me

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s fair! The cookie law requires that you can reject just as easy as accept, and mostly you just cannot.

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Personally I think the minimum cookies should be the default required by law and if people want to opt in too more, they can do so on a specific page of the website. Get rid of those stupid banners which I have to reject every single time.

            • Scrollone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              They could just respect the DNT standard… yet they decided to ignore it