• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s because Trump has said he wants the genocide to be stronger. Biden wants it to end, but isn’t doing much to stop it. Trump also wants to go after minorities in the US.

    Obama didn’t get the same support because his opponent wasn’t even close to as bad. Trump has already tried to overturn democracy. Republicans have also put together a plan to innact a Christo-fascist dictatorship (project 2025). The elections with Obama were business as usual. This election is, for many people, life or death, and potentially the last hope for democracy.

    Also, Obama was cooler than Biden but he wasn’t better. Honestly, I think if you were to compare their actions as president, Biden would be better. He still sucks, but he’s much better than I expected (very low bar). They’re just not great at communicating what he’s done.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trump has said he wants the genocide to be stronger.

      And Mitt Romney said “Double Gitmo”. That doesn’t absolve Obama or Biden for keeping the illegal torture prison open during their terms.

      You don’t absolve yourself of genocide by saying “Well, it was either me or Mega-Hitler”

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        You don’t absolve yourself of genocide by saying “Well, it was either me or Mega-Hitler”

        What? So let’s apply this to 1930s Germany.

        Your stance is that, if Hitlers political rivals stood for anything “wrong” by your moral code, whatever that is, that voters were in the right to not vote against literally Hitler?

        That’s taking “two wrongs don’t make a right” to extreme absolutes.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your stance is that, if Hitlers political rivals stood for anything “wrong” by your moral code, whatever that is, that voters were in the right to not vote against literally Hitler?

          This was what brought down the Hindenburg government, in fact. His performance in the Presidency was notoriously abysmal and his country suffered enormously under his tenure. In fact, one could very easily argue that Hindenburg’s failures created the Nazi Party, as disaffected voters fled the traditional political sphere for the edges of the ideological map - to the Nazis, the Communists, and the Friekorps radicals…

          It was, after all, Hindenburg himself who appointed Hitler to the Chancellorship, because he considered Hitler someone he could compromise with.

          This is a shockingly similar position to the current Biden/Schumer Congress, which consistently attempts to negotiate with “moderates” in the Republican Party even to this day.

          That’s taking “two wrongs don’t make a right” to extreme absolutes.

          Looking at the trajectory the conservative wing of the Democratic Party has us on, and comparing it to the Weimer Republic, reveals some terrifying parallels.

          This isn’t “two wrongs make a right” nearly so much as it is “the marginal less or two evils is still unconscionable”.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        No one is saying they’re absolved. Where have you heard that?

        The fact of the matter is that if you don’t like genocide or gitmo or whatever other horrible things, you should vote for the person who at worst wants to maintain the status quo of horrible things.

        That said, Obama wanted to close Gitmo. Biden has also condemned Israel’s attacks, and the US has warned them to stop. We’ve also stopped some military aid to them, but obviously not all. The recent jets, for example, still happened, but they’re air-superiority fighters which serve no use against Palestine. We’ve also continued to send a lot of other defensive aid, though offensive has slowed down if not stopped. To imply Obama or Biden didn’t try to do anything is ignorance at best, if not an outright lie. The fact of the matter is that much of it is handled by congress though, and republicans in congress will stop a Democrat from doing essentially anything.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          That said, Obama wanted to close Gitmo.

          Obama said he wanted to close Gitmo. He gave up forever at the very first setback.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sure, and we can question it, but we can’t know what he will do. My understanding is that he really had not control over that though