• Joe Bidet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I see… we’re either with you, or with the terrorists? :)

    I strongly disagree with your last statement indeed. It’s assuming all people here are shitposters and never done anything for privacy, and also assuming Ubuntu did anything for privacy at all, with a commercial model that inevitably slid down the road of sacrificing people’s privacy and the ethos of free/libre software for profit, and normalizing such behaviour. (you are the example of the latter, finding justifications for the unjustifiable…)

    If your personal conclusion is “trust company XX for defending privacy” you may end up grossly disappointed (unless you have a vested interest in that company,m in which case it is “just” marketing…)

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      creates analogy with 3 parties in it

      I see… we’re either with you, or with the terrorists? :)

      Reading comprehension is hard, yeah?

      It’s assuming all people here are shitposters and never done anything for privacy

      I develop FOSS applications. You may have used things I contributed to. But unless you’re the alt of Torvalds himself, I doubt you’ve done more than the entirety of Canonical, who has made huge waves of impact throughout the FOSS (and privacy) communities.

      Given that you misunderstood every point I made in this thread so far, it’s understandable the rest of your comment misses the mark.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because that was my original point that Joe Bidet wanted to debate. If Joe Bidet replied saying “How can you compare an individual person to some corporation”, that might be a good point, but he doubled down instead