Apple has said planned changes to British surveillance laws could affect iPhone users’ privacy by forcing it to withdraw security features, which could ultimately lead to the closure of services such as FaceTime and iMessage in the UK.

  • athlon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone commeting here saying “good, we will switch to X” is absolutely stupid. This law means no iMessage, no Signal, no WhatsApp, no Telegram, no secure encrypted messaging for anyone.

    • raesin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People completely missing the point for an opportunity to shit on Apple is on brand though. Lol.

      • athlon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I think there is hundreds reasons to shit on Apple, but this ain’t one of them.

    • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Either that or an app that has been vetted by government stooges and given the thumbs up as its trivial for others to access the content on.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good luck enforcing that.

      Anyway the criminals are just going to switch to something else so this law is useless

      • athlon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Great! If you’re technical and not have iOS. That’s already 50% of British market not using it.

        Besides, it won’t help you if that’s a government mandate, and Google will be forced to take it down for the UK market from the store. Not a lot of people are installing apps from outside the Play Store.

        • vd1n@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Too bad if people arent willing to adapt. I guess you’ll just have to use paper notes and face to face contact, or whatever app your government makes. /S

    • itchy_lizard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bullshit. Open source distributed messaging clients will always exist. The key is to federate and host in other countries.

      • athlon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, try explaining it to my 51 years old father. Or someone who really isn’t into tech in general.

        Federated stuff will work for you and I - technically knowledgeable people. But we are a tiny fraction of population. The success of WhatsApp lays in its super simplicity.

        • itchy_lizard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Click this link, type email and password. Federated services are just as easy from UX side. The complexity is the backend.

          • athlon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It seems easy, but the moment you ask the user to “choose their instance” - you already push away a lot of untechnical people. What is an instance? How do I know which one is good? Will I be able to talk to people on other instances (look at Lemmy, some instances are blocked by other instances)? Why do I even have to choose an instance?

            From an UX standpoint, that’s a disaster. Stuff like Lemmy or Mastodon will remain forever a niche, because of that.

            EDIT: Typo

            • itchy_lizard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, don’t tell your grandpa to pick an instance. Just link him straight to the registration page. Solved.

              Lemmy is the same. Facebook is the same. You don’t need to tell a user that their Facebook account is going to be shared by their geography. That doesn’t matter.

              Just link then to the registration page for the instance that you use. Easy.

    • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      1 year ago

      Signal have already said they will withdraw completely from the UK, as have WhatsApp, Session and a few others.

      • citytree@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If and when Signal is packaged for F-Droid, how is the British government going to stop people in the UK from using Signal?

        • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Knowing this gvmt, they’ll try and prevent access at the ISP level. They’ve already started making noises about tackling ‘the menace of VPN’s’.

          • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ll be out in six months to a year and since it takes them forever to achieve anything I wouldn’t worry.

            If you’ve got to have a right wing fascist government hope for an incompetent one.

            • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which would be fine except Starmer approves of all the things contained in the various bits of legislation.

    • itchy_lizard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, move to something that’s federated and not run by a corporation

    • zebus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real, wish I lived in the UK so I could get all my friends to adopt signal finally lol

  • j891319@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The UK cannot believe every tech company will allow the govt to pre-approve updates instead of just pulling out.

    • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you underestimate the deep stupidity and tech-ignorance of our politicians, coupled with their burning desire to know everything that we do. This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately both big parties tend towards authoritarianism too. The ‘nanny state’ is popular with voters.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

        This is a fundamental shift in mentality that has occurred over the last 30 years and it’s startling how many average people have bought in. There doesn’t need to be a reason for something to be legal, rather there needs to be a compelling reason for it not to be. People have stopped viewing freedom as fundamental right, but rather as something granted to them by the government on a case by case basis.

    • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      No normal person would think every tech company would, but our politicians are bloody idiots if we go by their history

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do they not see that encryption can happen in any form of communication even if they do get their backdoors? Are they going to make all encryption illegal?

        • Leraje@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure that’s the end-game, yes. At least as far as communication based tools go, which would include chat apps, VPN’s, cloud storage etc etc. The ruling classes in the UK are very nanny-state and genuinely believe that a persons right to privacy comes a distant second to being able to rule over us and control us more effectively.

          The issue for non-UK countries is that when world governments see that its possible to pass these sort of laws, they’ll be keen to do the same. And most people are not tech-savvy, they’ll have no real idea why it’s important or invasive. It’s difficult enough to get people to switch to Signal. Imagine trying to explain why breaking encryption is a bad thing for them.

          • IllNess@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds insane. Another law where the only people it affects negatively are non criminals.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do apple users in Europe actually use iMessage? I thought most users in the EU used Whatsapp or Signal

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a 40yr old Android user… I live without these apps. Hell, I might have even used them once in history…

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple’s arrogance leads it to threaten to remove something that’s neither unique nor actually cross-platform anyway.

    • microwavedgerbil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you even read the article? They are refusing to allow the British government to control the encryption standards used by the entire world. They are also not the only company to make this decision. Any company using E2EE will be affected.

      • itchy_lizard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People running their own (eg Matrix) servers outside the UK will be unaffected.