• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which also had the effect on pushing RISC-V development forward, which is great.

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          At a technical level it’s still young and most likely not as powerful as other similar platforms, but on a legal level the instruction set is an open standard and royaltee-free, so it can’t be embargoed through licensing like ARM or other instruction sets.

          I’m happy to see more openness in hardware.

            • erwan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 months ago

              No it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.

                • erwan@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.

                  So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.