

Maybe it’s a 55 gallon lube barrel?
Maybe it’s a 55 gallon lube barrel?
Making rabbit stew!
Because they’re too stupid to follow along and understand everyday politics, so this level of insanity seems like 3D chess to them.
He reminds me of an oranda goldfish.
The water just dilutes back into the rest of the ocean, lowering its average carbon content a minuscule amount. It’ll take a year or less for it to reabsorb as much atmospheric CO2 as was removed and for any carbon compounds altered by the pH changes to revert. It’ll likely hit peak CO2 before that point. This isn’t a big deal unless it’s done at massive scale in concentrated areas.
An “easy” way to handle this is to return the water to the deep ocean, where it’s less impactful to ocean life and has a much larger area in which to dilute.
It’s gasuous CO2. The process pulls in water, acidifies it to release carbon as CO2 to air in a sealed space, pumps that water to the next phase which adjusts the pH back up to normal, then the carbon poor water is pumped back into the ocean.
Meanwhile, the CO2 in the previously mentioned sealed space is concentrated up to about 98%, but it’s still a gas. While this may or may not be a more efficient extraction system, it still has the same issue all extraction systems face: what to do with the extracted gas.
Or this guy?
100%. I still enjoy reading Asimov and Heinlein despite them being bigots. I just don’t support the behavior and call it out for being bad when I see it.
You can also track aggregate up and down votes per user! You’re a solid +13 for me, you’re cool.
I jumped ship from .world to blahaj and it’s great. I have access to all of .world’s content, but can block the instance as needed.
Anecdotal evidence is worth less than nothing.
Or build up in the sewer with shit and grease. President Fatberg.
I felt my blood pressure spiking from just reading this. I’m glad you were okay!
That’s truly disgusting. I can fathom neither how sick one would have to write this nor how stupid one would have to be to believe it.
You make a great point, I completely agree. While the Orange Bumblefuck absolutely engaged in market manipulation, profiting by acting on non-public information is at the heart of insider trading, which I’m certain his accomplices did.
Agreed, concision is perhaps one of the most useful skills I learned that I’m absolutely rubbish at applying.
I corrected my first paragraph - it’s not “privileged information” as information on illegal activities isn’t legally protected nor legitimate business.
It isn’t technically privileged information - that’s generally understood to mean confidential information that is legally protected so that it does not have to be given to the public. What we’re working with is information about the actions the manipulator is taking to illegally manipulate the market.
It’s called insider trading as the trading is being informed by someone on “the inside” who knows something about (typically) legitimate business, generally for one company or an industry, the general public does not. Examples are new developments, earnings results, impending lawsuits, etc.
Edit: it’s early, I bungled the first paragraph so it got a rewrite.
The best windshield wiper fluid in Finland!