JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-27 个月前Sam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down110
arrow-up1440arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-27 个月前message-square69linkfedilink
minus-squaresuokolinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·7 个月前We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek… But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 个月前I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
minus-squareNaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·7 个月前You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model. It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
minus-squareirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 个月前Just the weights, training it is another story.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 个月前Better than others but not true “open source”
We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…
But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model.
It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
Just the weights, training it is another story.
Better than others but not true “open source”
True.