JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 年前Sam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square67linkfedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down110
arrow-up1440arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-21 年前message-square67linkfedilink
minus-squaresuokolinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·1 年前We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek… But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
minus-squareNaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·1 年前You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model. It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
minus-squareirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前Just the weights, training it is another story.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orgBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-24 个月前deleted by creator
We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…
But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model.
It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
Just the weights, training it is another story.
deleted by creator
True.