• suoko
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My question is actually: how do they know the set up for vision BCI? They showed that the set up will start with the 3 dots to be aligned, so they already tried it for real? Did they wire the brain visual output of a monkey to a screen and then tested the visual input coming from the camera sensors?

    And then another question: by going deeper to the part of our brain in charge of our speech should create much more public debates.

    It’s not sci-fi anymore, it’s ok to fix diseases, but can he openly talk about super humans? if you’re a kid/boy/girl fine, you like super heroes and that’s normal. But what grown up people think about it? Let’s say we don’t care about the possibility to see infrared light (do we?) the wiring of the biological brain to an AI would just speed up the connection of the two, something ALL can achieve with a standard connection via fingers. Should that be considered enough? Speed is nice but where do we have to run to? It’s not something that will lead to a distributed welfare/science/education for sure. It’s not like AI via phone/PC which is like the genius dad nobody ever had, that can correctly answer any possible question.

    I guess it could be compared to nuclear weapons: if everybody has them, they’re useless in the end.