Tiktok video: https://www.tiktok.com/@cattlemenfamilyfarms/video/7467698017559170350

Bsky post: https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3lhrdl5nt222s

Articles:

spoiler

ft.com US farmers ‘prepare for the worst’ in new Trump trade war Guy Chazan 7–9 minutes

Aaron Lehman’s soyabean farm in the heartland of Iowa feels like an oasis of calm in the turbulence and tumult of President Donald Trump’s second term. Yet all that could change in a matter of weeks.

Lehman is bracing himself for the impact of a potential trade war hatched in Washington that he says could lay low the US corn belt and irreparably harm America’s standing with its neighbours.

“Farmers understand that trading relationships go up on a stairway, where you work hard to build them up, but go down on an elevator — very, very fast,” Lehman said in the living room of his farmhouse about 20 miles north of Iowa’s capital Des Moines.

“The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner.”

It has been a turbulent week in US trade policy. Trump announced last weekend that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, saying they were not doing enough to stem the flow of migrants and the illicit drug fentanyl into the US. Then after last-minute talks with the two countries’ leaders, he agreed to give them both a 30-day reprieve.

The same was not the case for China. The 10 per cent levy he imposed on all Chinese imports still stands. And many in Iowa believe it is only a matter of time before the tariffs on America’s northern and southern neighbours are reinstated.

The opening salvo of a new trade war has sent a chill through the Midwest. Canada, Mexico and China together account for half of all American agricultural exports. Just last year, the US sold more than $30bn in farm products to Mexico, $29bn to Canada and $26bn to China, according to American Farm Bureau statistics.

Suddenly, farmers were facing the spectre of retaliatory tariffs and the prospect of a full-scale conflict that some fear could decimate America’s rural heartland. Two large grain silos and an old shed sit on a dry, grassy area with expansive flat fields in the background under a partly cloudy sky Farmers fear a full-scale trade war could decimate America’s rural heartland © Amir Prellberg/FT

Farmers in an area of the country that has become a bedrock of support for Trump now worry that the president’s tariffs, though suspended at the last minute, have permanently damaged the image of the US in the eyes of its most important trading partners.

“We’ve gone from being a seller of choice to a seller of last resort,” said Mark Mueller, a farmer from near Waterloo in north-east Iowa.

Few US states better embody the agricultural wealth of the Midwest than Iowa. It is a land of vast corn fields stretching as far as the eye can see, the landscape broken by the occasional grain silo, hay bale or low-slung barn. Hogs outnumber people more than seven to one.

It is also Trump country. Although Iowa voted for Democratic presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, it backed Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 in ever greater numbers.

More than a fifth of Iowa’s economy — or $53.1bn — is tied to agriculture, from crop and livestock production to food processing and manufacturing. It is the country’s largest producer of corn, hogs, eggs and ethanol and a top-three grower of soyabeans. That makes it particularly vulnerable to any downturn in agricultural exports.

“Free trade is the backbone of the economy in the Midwest,” said Ernie Goss, an economist at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. “What we have here is some of the most productive agriculture on the face of the Earth, and the domestic market is not even close to being big enough to absorb all the commodities produced here. You have to have international markets.” Aaron Lehman is seated near a window inside a room, wearing glasses and a checkered shirt ‘The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner,’ said Aaron Lehman © Amir Prellberg/FT

The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Trump in his first term. Among the most striking moves was Trump imposing duties on $300bn of Chinese goods. Beijing responded in 2018 by slapping 25 per cent tariffs on imports of US soyabeans, beef, pork, wheat, corn and sorghum.

The skirmish ended with the countries signing a trade deal in 2020 under which Beijing pledged to increase its purchases of US goods and services. But since then, it has been buying more grain from countries such as Argentina and Brazil, which overtook the US as China’s top supplier of corn in 2023.

In the last trade war, “a lot of our Asian buyers started developing relationships with soyabean producers in South America, and they’ve taken more and more of our market”, said Lehman, who is also president of the Iowa Farmers Union. “And we haven’t got it back.”

Not all of Iowa’s farmers oppose the way Trump has used the threat of tariffs to achieve a key policy objective — stemming illegal immigration.

“It was a strategy he needed to use to . . . get those countries to the negotiating table,” said Steve Kuiper, a fourth-generation Iowa farmer who grows corn and soyabeans in Marion County, south-east of Des Moines. After all, “a president has just four years to accomplish all he’s promised to do, so he’s got to get things going immediately to gain traction”.

Still, he is pessimistic that Mexico and Canada will be able to deliver on their pledges to Trump to strengthen border security in time. “It takes forever for these things to happen, and they’ve only got 30 days,” he said. A view through a window shows a barren soybean field The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Donald Trump in his first term © Amir Prellberg/FT

The prospect of another round of trade tensions comes with American farmers already in a tight spot, hit by a fall in crop prices and higher costs. Net farm income, a broad measure of profits, was $181.9bn in 2022 but is projected to have been $140.7bn in 2024, according to data from the US Department of Agriculture — a 23 per cent slump.

“This [trade war] isn’t coming at a good time,” said Rick Juchems, a farmer from near Plainfield in north-east Iowa. “Commodity prices are low and the price of inputs like seed and fertiliser is going up.” Sources from the Iowa Corn Growers Association said many farmers had been producing at a $100 per acre loss.

Investments in new equipment are down, reflecting the wider downturn, said Juchems. “I’ve got friends who’ve lost their jobs selling agricultural machinery because of reduced demand. The lots are full of unsold tractors.”

Makers of farm equipment such as Deere, Kinze Manufacturing and Bridgestone/Firestone have shed hundreds of jobs in Iowa since last year.

Yet the prospects for farm finances could get even gloomier if Trump makes good on his threat of import levies. Fertiliser, for example, could become much more expensive, since more than 80 per cent of the US’s supply of potash — a key ingredient — comes from Canada.

But perhaps the most destructive effect of the tariff debate is the uncertainty it has triggered, just ahead of the crucial spring planting season.

“We’ll get by as long as we know what’s coming,” said Juchems. “But things are changing all the time. I’m sure the whole world is laughing at us.”

Lehman said farmers were trying to stay optimistic. “They tell me they’re hopeful cooler heads will prevail and this dispute will result in good trade agreements,” said Lehman. “But they’re also preparing for the worst.”

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    reagan bankrupted thousands of farmers too. conservatives are horrible for the rural voters who always hit that button

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    Mr. Farmer, when trump talks about finding fraud in government, he’s referring to USAID paying you for your farm products. You are the waste he is referring to.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      This dude doesn’t mention Trump or Republicans once during the entire video. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if somehow he blames this on the previous administration. I’ve already had multiple conversations blaming any adverse effects from Trump’s decisions on Biden and the Democrats in a similar fashion.

      • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        In the TikTok video, no, but in the BlueSky video, he mentions he voted for Trump. Although, your point most likely still stands, because he doesn’t place blame.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Lots of reasons. Generally its not just corn but soybeans too. Essentially the USA has optimized its supply chain for producing massive amounts of corn and soybeans and bringing them to market. The subsidy is to ensure that USA capacity to produce enough food for its populace irrespective of geopolitics or world economies. We never want to be in a position where we aren’t ramped up to feed our population entirely. If you overproduce, you can always get rid of the excess. If you underproduce, at least a portion of your population goes hungry. That cannot be allowed to happen. The ancillary benefits are things like USAID that use the overproduction as expressions of Soft Power around the world in the form of nutritional aid.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    I don’t feel bad at all for anyone that voted for Trump. I’ve lost all my sympathy this round. I hope he loses his farm. You fucked around, I hope you find out.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I love that you can make a statement like that and people are ok with it now. I said similar last year about how I had no more empathy left for people in red states and was attacked about how bad a person I was and how intolerant. I think that this election may have changed some peoples’ perspective on things.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        This election shredded my last hope and last ounce of tolerance. I could almost give people a pass for voting for him once. I still think it was naive and stupid the first time. But if for nothing else other than to try something different I could almost forgive it. But for anyone that saw that first round and said “yeah I’ll have more of that and then some”, get fucked. I don’t malign you for having been ahead of the curve, and you are right that this election changed some perspectives.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    The “conservative” plan is and has always been to eliminate small businesses. That dipshit’s land will get gobbled up by a corporation.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    “But a billionaire is already rich, why would they need to steal from us?”

    What so many people fail to realize is that you only become a billionaire if there is something broken in your soul. Sane people retire to live very comfortable private lives, to enjoy the remainder of their finite time on this Earth with their family, friends, and hobbies. Sane people stop earning money and retire long before they reach anywhere near even a single billion in wealth. The one exception to this are those who create a product while of modest means and see it explode in profitability; see someone like Notch. But even Notch sold Minecraft off and now spends his time pursuing passion projects, rather than tirelessly working to wring more dollars out of his golden goose.

    Sane people work to live. You do not become a billionaire unless your greed is insatiable.

    Most people say that Elon Musk is the richest person on Earth. But they are wrong. I don’t know who the richest person on Earth is. But I know for a fact that I am wealthier than Elon Musk. He is a pauper before me. I have something Elon Musk has never had, does not have, will never have, and is utterly incapable of ever having.

    Enough.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I was speaking to my grandparents, who are from Iowa, about Elon Musk a short time before the elections. We were discussing how he isn’t a good person and how the levels of greed it takes to become someone in his position prove that. They said something similar that opening quote, to which I responded, “It really makes you wonder why he always needs more, doesn’t it?”.

      The discussion ended here.

  • TangoNoir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    This does make me feel very sad though. Sad that our education system and culture let people like this down and left them so gullible. There are a lot of steps that have to happen before people make terrible decisions like this.

    This isn’t excusing it but I am an Anthropologist and I can’t help but look at everything as an elaborate cultural web. The disease is way deeper than the voting populace. These people were lied to and believed it?!

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Good.

    MAGAts can only learn the hard way.

    So this chode actually has a shot at learning something for once in his life.

  • Whateley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    “The whole world is laughing at us.”

    No, they’re laughing at Trump voters. The rest of us they just feel sorry for.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Nah, we’re also laughing at the non-voters and third-party voters. Even some of the Democratic voters are worthy of ridicule.

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    To be honest, I have never understood why the “average joe” ever identified with Trump, whose whole point is that he is a “successful” billionaire businessman. Why they believe he’s looking out for the little guy is beyond me.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Probably one of a few things.

      • always voted R
      • one or a few, policies matter to them more than anything (abortion, tax cuts etc.)
      • likes the toxic traits (owning the libs, bigotry, pro America and fuck everyone else)
      • fell for the neo-con lie that conservative = good economy = better for everyone
      • fell for the “we’re going to help the working man” Conservative lie

      But most likely, imo, is that the average Joe is just way less politically engaged or aware, then you and your peers. They don’t see all the bullshit, bigotry, obvious lies, the way R policies will fuck them over. They just know times are tough, prices are high and “right wing dude said he’d fix it”.

    • PaleRider@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Why they believe he was ever a successful businessman is beyond me…

      The guy is a fucking rich kid moron.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I have never understood why the “average joe” ever identified with Trump

      A major reason for the vehement support the right receives is trying to control what people can say.

      The left has itself to blame for its overreaching censorship in online spaces for why so many people feel more comfortable being part of the right.

      You can’t just tell the “average joe” that a man is a woman and vice-versa, then ban him for saying otherwise and expect him to stay on your side.

      • muelltonne@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Can you explain what you mean with “censorship in online spaces from the left”? As far as I know, most of our digital infrastructure is in the hand of MAGA right wing billionaires (X, Facebook, Instagram) and other people who are not really known as left (Reddit, TikTok, Google/YouTube). Most of our big social networks are not doing any left wing censorship. YouTube will demonitize you when you swear enough, because advertisers don’t like that. Musk will censor you when you disagree with his politics. Trump will fire you if you mention certain words. But that is right wing censorship. So where are those spaces where the left is censoring everything that are pushing people to vote for the right?

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          You can’t just tell the “average joe” that a man is a woman and vice-versa, then ban him for saying otherwise and expect him to stay on your side.

          • Fluke@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            You think everyone is a transphobic bigot and that’s what swayed the vote?

            There’s no helping people like you.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              Yeah, I rest my case.

              Keep doing your part to try and control what people think while expecting them to join your side.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s big strong frame, imposing physique makes them feel respected, and it’s supple, soft and warm seats make them feel loved. Why wouldn’t you rant in your 80k emotional support vehicle?

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Honestly, maybe so the family doesn’t see, while they can gather composure. A little bit of “men don’t cry” and a little bit of “don’t want the family to all have heart attacks before I know for sure”

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Dude doesn’t quite connect the dots. The government — under Biden — had a deal to save his farm. The government — under Trump — is changing all the rules, reneging on the contract. If all he groks from this is “government bad,” then game over. Except it’s not a game.

    • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      My impression from the video is that all he is taking from this situation is “government bad.”

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean, it is sort of the lesson. The government sort of exists to be stable and a stabilizing force.

        We’ve concentrated power in the executive branch for years, throughout several administrations. If one election can cause this much chaos in a month (really a few weeks). Than the government isn’t performing it’s primary function.

        At this point I’m not sure how much it matters that one party is mostly responsible. The state is looming on failure. These radical position shifts every few years are a bad thing.

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Most (none of them, probably) governments aren’t designed to deal with this level of intentional destruction of infrastructure. They expect officials to govern the country, not set it on fire.

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The gut reaction to to laugh at the way he voted and tell him hey gets what he deserves.

    He made a great follow up video on why that attitude is pushing people like him away.

    It’s worth a watch. I’ll link it here.

    He’s also actively trying to engage in a substantial political conversation and may be interested in changing his vote in the next cycle.

    https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT2BV9vyH/

    EDIT: In many ways, this community is appropriate for all the people in it.

    We talk down to anyone who doesn’t vote like us, we laugh at them, and hope for their suffering. No wonder all those people hate us and want to vote against the left out of spite. Seems like we did it to ourselves as much as they did it to us.

    Also, it’s funny for all the people who make fun of this guy for not doing research, but 90% didn’t actually watch any of his video, especially not the one I shared.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      “They both hate us”

      So vote for an alternative party.

      I know it isn’t easy, and the system is rigged, but what you’re doing isn’t helping.

    • keegomatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s too fucking late. Who gives a shit how he’s going to vote next cycle? There will not be a legitimate vote next cycle. Pushing people like him away? It’s over. There are no more chances. It’s all a show from here on out. That is not an exaggeration.

        • keegomatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Presumably you have heard about the government agencies being shuttered, unvetted no-security-clearance ex-hackers being given write access to government systems, the three branches of government being controlled by the offending party, including the one that decides whether laws are constitutional or not, open embrace of fascist rhetoric, symbols, and traditional talking points, door to door ICE, election interference, widely reported foreign influence, widely reported billionaire influence, discussion from POTUS himself about annexing other countries, Jesus I could keep going for miles but it’s not remotely necessary

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I don’t know how you get from there to “we’re never going to be able to vote again”. It’s only been 3 fucking weeks and people are running around like it’s the end of the world.

            • keegomatic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              Those examples all relate to why we will not have another legitimate election in the US. We’ll be able to vote again. It just won’t matter. Elections take place in fascist countries all over the world. They aren’t real. You cannot vote fascists out of power. They have been given power in the US and they will now keep it.

                • keegomatic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Nope, but I can see the very recent past, and all signs point to an already-captured government and the moneyed interests behind that capture solidifying their influence on public opinion through a similarly captured media and social media landscape.