Discussion questions:

What new books are you reading?

Do you prefer fiction or non-fiction?

Question of the week:

What are your favorite publishers?

Enjoy!

(I do this so people here can talk about things other than politics so enjoy yourselves.)

  • SovereignState
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Currently reading Socialism Betrayed: Behind the Collapse of the Soviet Union by Roger Keeran and Thomas Kenny and it’s been highly informative thus far. I wasn’t aware that Corn-man Khruschev was less a rightist than he was a deranged ultraleftist, passing along policy that a kindergartener may think “communism” is like dramatic wage-leveling and a damn near complete decentralization of state bureaucracy. This all led to way more financial and societal chaos than it did anything else. Yet… to his credit, he was a rather great internationalist. Not as great as Stalin, but he did try to stand behind the socialist and third world.

    • Makan ☭ CPUSAOP
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Roger Keeran wrote about the CPUSA in this one book about labor unions.

      I read it. Would highly recommend it.

  • @frippa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I started the state and revolution but idk I can’t seem to concentrate this week

    My favorite publisher was editori riuniti, before the 90s want alive back then, but basically they already became revisionists after 1953, but at least they still published classic Marxist authors like marx, engels, Lenin, gramsci etcc (even if saying that Marx is a Marxist is a bit like saying jesus was a Christian) now they don’t even publish Lenin, big sad seeing a real one fall to revisionism and liberalism

    Now I don’t really know, maybe Feltrinelli because it was literally founded by a communist guerrilla that financed a communist autonomist movement in Sardinia and died trying to blow up a rail track, rad story

  • @_KOSMONAUT@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Been slowly working my way through le Carré’s Karla Trilogy, but slowly starting to hate it more bit by bit. I still think spy stories are better if the setting is the Cold War.

    I think now I prefer nonfiction and theory books more now, though, as I continue to learn. Should probably focus more on actually getting through them rather than reading snippets or shorter works as they come up, especially since sometimes I feel I’m not getting the full picture as I’m not entirely confident in my foundation of knowledge. Got a lot of stuff I’ll probably have to reread at some point.

    • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      spy stories are better if the setting is the Cold War.

      I agree, for a variety of reasons. That said, are there any spy fiction novels that aren’t steeped in insane levels of US propaganda?

  • QueerCommie
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I’m reading Evil Geniouses by Kurt Anderson, which is kind of liberal, but it’s a reasonably well researched book on the rise of neoliberalism in the US. I’m reading Bear Awareness by Ajahn Brahm and it’s a good introduction to Buddhism, im noticing some apparent contradictions, as often comes from organized religion, but a lot of it seems valuable. I’m also reading Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism by Kohei Saito which is a little anti-Stalinist, but otherwise fine so far. In fiction I recently finished the Fault in our Stars by John Green (for school), which wasn’t terrible, but I don’t like romance books too much, and I’m considering reading the Crying at Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon thanks to the Programmed to Chill podcast’s episodes on it and also Wild Seed by Octavia Butler, which I quit near the end a couple years ago.

      • QueerCommie
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Named after the book programmed to kill, it’s a podcast about “crime, parapolitics, and esoterica” (according to the intro). They’ve mainly covered fascist history and random conspiracy stuff. I think theyre pretty well read. I don’t know if they’re ML, but I think Jimmy’s (host) at least read Lenin.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fiction, I’ve been getting back into Warrior Cats after forgetting about it since my childhood. Not suggesting it’s Shakespeare or that it doesn’t have plot issues, but I honestly like it. It doesn’t take itself too seriously and it also has animal characters both of which I love for a casual read. Currently re-reading my favourite parts of the old books but eventually I want to try the latest releases.

    Nonfiction, I’ve been researching insect ecology and the perception of physics at tiny sizes for one of my fiction worldbuilding projects. Actually, my first worldbuilding project about talking bugs from when I was like 12 which I want to bring back and develop properly.

      • Marxism-Fennekinism
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mostly I just want to do literary roleplay for now (think Dungeons and Dragons but novelized and with talking bugs) with these concepts but I certainly want to write a chapatered web novel eventually. In fact, since roleplays can get very detailed, they can be and have been edited and adapted into novels.

  • @LVL@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Reading What Is To Be Done by Lenin currently.

    Also looking for recommendations for books about Cuba (can be about the revolution itself, leaders, their political system, history after the revolution, etc) and books about basketball/NBA.

    • QueerCommie
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Haven’t read any of these, but: The economics of revolution, The motercycle diaries, and reminiscences of the Cuban revolution, all by Che Guevara,

      • @LVL@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Thanks, I’ll look into them. I usually don’t use study guides but this book has been a bit harder to understand than some others I’ve read.

  • @100beep@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    Working through Lenin’s State and Revolution. Decided that it was time to actually bother reading theory rather than just going on what everyone else says. As for nonfiction, rereading His Dark Materials. I read it once years ago, really hits different. The church-controlled word is scary… (I’m assuming one of the main divergence points there was the successful crushing of the Revolution.)

  • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I am admittedly waaay behind on my reading. Partially due to weather playing with my brain.

    For non-fiction I’m still at Cornforth. Finally finished the bits about language, now onto ideologies and science. He writes quite well and interestingly about the formation of ideologies off of the material conditions, although I would imagine some of the more religious comrades might find it offensive (he speaks about the formation of religion a few times).

    For fiction, I continue massaging my brain with Warhammer novels, specifically the Crime series. It’s a bit hit and miss, but I like the setting - backtracking from the grandiose and monumental, and focusing instead on what’s happening in the background. The madness and misery, much of it brought on by the system itself, even if unintentionally.

    Frankly a lot of fiction is getting hard to read, because of the various biases and overall undialectic or unmaterial views

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I like to mix fiction/non fiction, and currently going through The Culture series, I’m currently up to Surface Detail. Gonna be a bit sad when it’s over. Was a great series overall.

    And I find Tor tend to put out a lot of good sci-fi that I read, Leftoworld obviously gets a shout out too. :)

    • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      How do you like the Culture series? Admittedly I’ve only read one book and started another, but it was just a mess, honestly

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I find it’s a bit of a hit and miss. I really enjoyed a few books like Consider Phlebas and The Player of Games, but some other didn’t really work for me. I really enjoy the idea behind Culture, and the world building that Banks does in the series. I also really enjoyed this write up Banks did on the background for the series, and how he basically believes in a communist society with central planning http://www.vavatch.co.uk/books/banks/cultnote.htm

        • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Colour me surprised. Phlebas was the one book I’ve read, and Player was the one I started and dropped. Largely because of how obnoxiously US-lib it all felt, long before I knew how to put it to words.

          But to learn this about Banks is something very new. Thanks!

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            The aspect of Phlebas that I really liked was the futility of the protagonist. Meanwhile, Player was interesting in the perspective of how life can lose meaning if there is no actual challenge in it. There are definitely lib aspects to Banks work with him being a product of western culture, but I tend to look past that.

            • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              life can lose meaning if there is no actual challenge in it

              Soviet authors had made the same case much better. Meanwhile the Player made the apparent protag sound exactly like the western bourgeoisie, or even aristocrats from ye olde days - suffering, because he has nothing more to wish for, because all his needs has been sated. Oh woe is me, my life is too awesome!

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Sure, but the context is that the protagonist lives in a post scarcity society where AIs can do anything a human can do better. Self actualization is an interesting problem in that scenario. Soviet sci-fi did a great job exploring post scarcity societies to be sure, but I don’t recall this particular problem’s been addressed there. Generally, humans were the drivers of things and any robots were envisioned at best equals as opposed to superiors.

                • @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  It’s not about robots being superior, but more in terms of “what makes life worth it?”. A good example would be Strugacky’s “Monday begins on Saturday”. Spoilers, but the “wizards” essentially find their productive labour (scientific research of magic) to be more captivating than having “fun” the usual way (partying, drinking). Likewise, in Bulychev’s “Adventures of Alice” a scientist uses “laziness gas” to subdue some space pirates. He notes that he is seemingly unaffected, because he values different things in life than they do ( again, productive behaviour). This is a chidlren’s book, mind.

                  With Banks it seemed that the premise was “Well AI solved all of our problems and woes, so now we have to purposefully find things to stir us and also we got into a war because we had to”. Which is an unbelieveably USian view. Now, I suppose it sounds like I am berating your choice of literature - that was not the intention. Those books just make me angry for some reason.

  • @sgtnasty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago
    1. The Principal Upanisads - S. Radhakrishnan
    2. Non-fiction mostly
    3. Publisher? no idea, but my favorite author is Gene Wolfe

    I just got “The Romance of the Three Kingdoms” (Luo Guanzhong) and really looking forward to reading it.