witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comimagemessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1278arrow-down1122
arrow-up1156arrow-down1imageSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comwitchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square111fedilink
minus-squareKilgore Troutlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThey need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found. I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoNo doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found.
I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.