• Sam Ark And@aus.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    @yogthos The hp printer I bought disabled itself after my firewall blocked its spyware/telemetry.
    (The box said I needed an ‘internet connection’ not a ‘raw, unfiltered connection’. And any computer worked/works on said connection.)

    I took it back to the retailer. They unhappily refunded my money.

    You should do that to.

    • Mike Harrison@fosstodon.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos Used to be an HP fanboi. No longer. For small office and home use I’ve been happy with Brother. Home has a cheap B&W laser that just works, Linux and Mac just sees it and it’s not picky about cartridges/drums, etc… but the real OEM ones aren’t expensive. - My wife needs nice color prints every now and then, cheaper to just pay the local print shop.

    • C.@mindly.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos Do you have a picture of the error message it gave you? I’d love to see it.

      Bricking when presented “unauthorized” ink or toner is well-known for HP of the last X years, but I hadn’t heard of them doing it when you block their network access.

      For many years I’ve been telling people who ask “Buy an HP laser printer. Just don’t buy a new one.” There’s a huge market for used office printers, and you can get one old enough that it will use 3rd-party toner.

      #HP

      • Independent Jake@techhub.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        @cazabon @Heterokromia @yogthos So the HP inkjet was a huge disappointment to me. It no long works after 13mo. because it can’t communicate with the mother ship. I will NEVER return to HP and it’s overarching control of my equipment. I had followed all the rules, used their ink subscription, which was also a HUGE negative experience. Purchased a different brand that does NOT communicate with the manufacturer. I’m buying my ink supply as I need it. So much happier.

        • C.@mindly.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @joytoworld93 @Heterokromia @yogthos

          That’s terrible. When I added a Lexmark printer to my network a year ago, I firewalled it off from the outside world on general principle - it never even occurred to me that a printer manufacturer would make communicating with the mothership a requirement for normal operation. I guess I’m lucky #Lexmark hasn’t gone that route.

          I’m glad you found something else that works for you. Did you get an #Epson #Ecotank printer? Very cost-effective.

          • Independent Jake@techhub.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @cazabon @Heterokromia @yogthos I got a Canon laser. Costs much more, weighs a ton, but it’s really a fast printer with excellent print quality and NO requirement for it to check in to it’s manufacturer for permission to print. I’m pretty much over inkjets, period.

            It’s the old saying, you get what you pay for. Only downside is that you need to wear a back brace to move it.

    • Ray McCarthy@historians.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos So far the Brother Lasers / MFP etc we’ve bought over the years have been fine without Internet and with 3rd party toner. Also decent Linux drivers for print & scan from Brother. HP were good 25 years ago for laser. Never good for inkjet. Decent HP gear now has Agilent badges.

      • Sam Ark And@aus.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        @GustavinoBevilacqua @yogthos I was *wildly* curious about it too. I imagine a public key cryptographic mechanism, but I do not know how it actually works. My keenness to get my money back completely overrode my curiosity about the network protocol. (Yes, that’s very unusual for me.)

    • Richard Welty@en.osm.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos there was a time i respected HP. i have two HP printers both of which are 1) very nice and 2) predate ink and toner madness. HP has cured my respect for the company. i shall not buy another of their products.

    • Firehorseart lives!@ohai.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos

      I’m on an HP ink sub, as I have a printer a friend gave me - to replace an old printer that had jammed (after 10 years). The old printer was probably a Brother, which worked well despite my lack of maintenance.

      IThe newer HP is a great printer apart from its need to constantly monitor my usage. I’ll keep it until I get a another affordable colour printer.

      • Zach Fine@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        @uninventive @Heterokromia @yogthos FWIW Brother has started chipping their toner cartridges over the past few years. I just set up an HL-L6200DW and immediately made sure it had no internet access to make sure it stays on its current firmware and doesn’t upgrade to one that might lock-out 3rd party toner.

        • Uninventive@universeodon.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @zachnfine @Heterokromia @yogthos Most refills have chips.

          Brother’s method of a IR light shining through a semiopaque window on the side and not going through the other side had some downsides. (Want the most out of your cartridge? Stick tissue over the window, run it dry.)

          Most manufacturers just stick with a count chip that disables the cartridge after X000 uses.

          And to be honest, if all the businesses start going that anticonsumer across the industry, happy to sell the printer and just go paperless. Probably best for all involved. Force offices to change their processes faster, better for the planet over time, and they can stick it to the holdouts who won’t change.

    • @Heterokromia @yogthos And it Came To Pass that one of the Master’s Chattering Servants found it self alone, and unable to commune with it’s Master.
      This made it sullen, and it spat in it’s Caretakers face.
      Many would have bent the knee, but this Caretaker was wiser than most.
      It banished the Chattering Servant from its domain, and demanded restitution from the Chaos Merchants.

      Hail to thee, @Heterokromia

    • Canecittadino@mastodon.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Heterokromia @yogthos @cstross Why do I get the feeling that in an age where your toothbrush spies on you, where even the mightiest can be caught with their genitals in unseemly positions in unseemly places, where media gotcha engines have finally lapsed into a coma after getting everybody who can possibly be gotten, we’ll see a mighty uprising of tolerance? After all, didn’t someone righteously god-fearing once tell us that we’re all sinners in the hands of a bespoke surveillance algorithm?

      • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Canecittadino @Heterokromia @yogthos

        Sadly, I disagree.

        “If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.”

        —Cardinal Richelieu

        Also:

        “If you’ve done nothing wrong you’ve got nothing to hide”

        — Various People

        Now meet deepfakes.

        Everyone is guilty: it may just take the Party some time to reveal the evidence of the crime they must have committed.

        • Canecittadino@mastodon.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @cstross @Heterokromia @yogthos Well of course I would agree with you if it were simply a matter of “homo homini lupus.” The thing is that in the historical contexts you rightly appeal to, it has always been possible for the inquiring class to excuse themselves from inquiry. Until they couldn’t, of course—a Man for All Seasons, Politburo purges under Stalin, etc. Once we all have access to AWS and ChatGPT X, everyone will live in fear until the mode of the music changes. Which it just might do.

          • jaKa Močnik@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            @Canecittadino @cstross @Heterokromia @yogthos you see, there’s this thing called power, which is fairly unevenly distributed, so there’s always people that are beyond any inquiry and very interested in that those others aren’t. this latter thing is called control. and the times we live in tell that both concepts are very much fine and well and much the same as they were in the historic times. so, yes, you should care about your privacy. 🤷

            • Canecittadino@mastodon.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              @jkmcnk @cstross @Heterokromia @yogthos All true for now, but the situation is also more fluid than it used to be, largely because of the rapid evolution of communications technologies. Compare the longevity of the Roman Catholic Church or the British Monarchy with that of the Thousand Year Reich, or the Soviet Politburo. How long do you suppose Ron DeSantis is going to last? /1

                • Canecittadino@mastodon.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  @jkmcnk @cstross @Heterokromia @yogthos “Quis costodiet ipsos custodes” is the real issue here. When the watchers operate on a scale no human agency can effectively oversee, anomalies may very well become more frequent. China’s social credit evaluation regime will be the best test case for these suppositions, I think. We shall see…. /3 END