I’ll go first. I’ve used a lot of search engines, I used duckduckgo for quite some time but found their search results kinda bad. I’m currently using ecosia the search results are similar to ddg’s but at least I’m planting trees, so there’s that.

      • noodlejetski@kbin.social
        1·
        1 year ago

        yup. or rather their short form, !g and !a in your example, because no one’s got time to type out the entire names (:

  • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish
    111·
    1 year ago

    Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

    • Actual privacy
    • No BS like with DDG
    • AI features (like a “quick answer” feature that’s really useful)
    • Has its own index along with others
    • Search results are great, probably better than DDG’s
    • “Lenses” (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
    • Devs are pretty cool
    • Rick@thesimplecorner.orgEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I’ve been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.

      Edit: The pricing is… very… meh.

    • Pumpkin@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that’s really cool. Do you think it’s worth the money?

      • zarquon@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        It’s only a few bucks a month. I think so.

        The only thing I don’t like is needing to be logged in to search. That always feels like a huge invasion of privacy. The at least claim that they don’t log search contents though

      • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Bit biased cause I’ve had it for a while and have a ‘legacy plan’. But even without that, absolutely.

    • DengueDucky@lemmy.mlEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I want to give it a try but it’s hard to justify the cost with limited searches. I don’t want to have to keep track of how many times I’ve searched or second guess if I “really need to search for that”.

    • bit@kbin.social
      21·
      1 year ago

      Kagi is absolutely wonderful. Highly recommend giving it ago. Gives me better results than google while having a fair privacy policy

    • smoke_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now and I love it. When I think about how much of my life revolves around accurate information, the price is negligible.

    • Nina@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I was using DuckDuckGo and it was giving me pretty ‘eh’ results, only marginally better than google on the surface level, but both weren’t really usable for deep older searches. (and ddg starting to add sus ads/promoted) Brave is better, but Kagi has been fantastic when I’ve really needed to find something specific, technical, or very old. I think the best way to come about the pricing structure and limited search results is that I think it’s not supposed to be your only search engine from then on. There are times when you need what kagi gives in terms of producing quality and relevant results, and times you just wanna search “[company name] reviews/is a scam?” that using kagi wouldn’t serve you better than anything else, so it’s more of a tool that you bring out when you aren’t finding what you need with free search engines. On it’s own page it doesn’t try and oversell you on it, they admit that the majority of people don’t need paid search most of the time.

      I haven’t approached if it’s an early netflix thing where you could split the bill with others for one login/family plan, that might make it more feasible.

    • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.comEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

      Huh. I hadn’t heard of this one before, but I think I’m going to have to try it out.

      • darcmage@kbin.social
        4·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that hard to determine without specifying which engines are used in your chosen instance? Searx/Searng has provided superior results for me using a combination of engines compared to anything provided by any of the alternatives by themselves.

      • teoria@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        It can literally use any search engine you think of as a backend, so its strictly higher quality? Unless thats what you meant

  • Kissaki@feddit.deEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    DuckDuckGo

    I also use Firefox search bookmarks for searching specific sites.

    Search Bookmark: You prepare the URL with a %s placeholder and give the bookmark a tag, and you can type tag searchterm and it’ll open it.

    I’m using it for opening word definitions, word translations, searching reference documentation, searching specific platforms/websites/media types, etc.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.caEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    Duck Duck Go. It just works for me. I’ve never had a problem with it’s results.

  • cereals@lemmy.mlEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    Most small search engines use bing results which are a hit or miss compared to Google.

    Startpage is the only privacy focused one I found that uses Google search results. The UI is fine for the most part, except the image search maybe.

    Edit: typo

  • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.deEnglish
    61·
    1 year ago

    SearX-NG, coming off DuckDuckGo it wasn’t a major change in the internal structure (the search gets relayed over to a larger search engine), but there’s no one company behind it like DDG. They’ve been working together with Microsoft on some rather sketchy things.

    I would still love to self-host something decent (that doesn’t relay over to a company), but nothing like that exists as far as I know.

    • CookieJarObserver@feddit.deEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      From what i know the exemption thing was only in the app and has been removed by now and so far the alternatives are… Not very Suitable for everyday use, at least for me.

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.deEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        I’ve heard similar things several times, so I’ve been staying away. I should move more of my daily tasks to different self-hosted or non-corporate services.

  • Rats@kbin.social
    5·
    1 year ago

    Duckduckgo for the most part, especially if I already know where I want to get to. Google as a backup like others are saying.

  • Steve@lemmy.worldEnglish
    51·
    1 year ago

    I hate adds. I was using Neeva. Just switched to Kagi. After nearly 3 weeks, it looks like 300 searches/month will work for me. So $5 a month is fine.

  • Adi2121@lemmy.mlEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using SearXNG. It is a fork of SearX, a popular open source metasearch search engine. Basically SearX allows you to use multiple search engines for a search, and only the results are there, no ads. SearXNG changes the UI to be better, adds some other engines for a variety of things to search, like images. Currently I’m using ericafteric.top as my instance; it is the fastest US instance with search suggestions support since I can’t selfhost.

    • pimeys@beehaw.orgEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      I run my own SearXNG instance too. I set it up to a Hetzner box, then blocked all ports from the firewall except on the Tailscale network. This means the machine which wants to use the search needs to be connected first to the same Tailscale network. It allows me to prevent being blocked by the search providers for too much traffic and is been working great. I just open http://SearXNG from my browser and start searching.

    • mego_pie@kbin.social
      2·
      1 year ago

      You can, it just works a bit differently than google if that is what you’re used to. It doesn’t outright exclude results with -, just de-emphasizes it in the results, of course with how tailored many web pages are to gaming search algorithms that doesn’t do much. If you want to outright eliminate certain websites from the search you can do that with -site:siteyouwantgone.here