Yeah we all hear the main arguments… AI is bad because of slop content, stealing from creators, brain rot & brain damage, privacy concerns and most importantly… how billionaires are just using it for their own selfish reasons

​But I’m asking about YOU 🫵 personally. The individual. What do you really think about AI? Do you care or are you indifferent? Has it actually affected your day to day life?

  • tyz@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve played with it on occasion, see no practical use in my case. I do think its neat because it further illegitimatizes copyright law. and maybe puts a few white collar workers out of a job. but thats about it.

      • tyz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        why wouldn’t i? its a bourgeois concern. the concept of ‘owning’ anything digital is artificially imposed and dumb.

          • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            I understand copyright law is what allows individual artists to make a living under the currently dominant ideology, it still doesn’t change the fact that materially it doesn’t make sense and it’s an entirely ideological construct. Even today under capitalism electronic devices, storage on those devices and bandwidth to get data to those devices via the Internet is really cheap, this is proven by the fact that lots of people in extremely poor countries have smartphones and an Internet connection even when they don’t have basic amenities like proper healthcare or education. The vast majority of the world population can have pretty much any kind of digital art in the palm of their hands very quickly for essentially free, the current material conditions allow for this, it is why piracy exists, it exists because it easily can exist.

            Copyright law is here only to impose the dominant ideology onto the essentially post-scarcity digital world and for that to happen it needs to introduce significant inefficiencies in the distribution of digital goods that are materially extremely cheap to reproduce after the initial cost of making them.

            • opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              its not about that though. some people here are arguing that AI art is not theft…

                  • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Ok but what’s the gameplan here for artists exactly? Cat’s out of the bag, I don’t think it’s realistic that big AI companies are going to dole out royalties to millions of random artists around the world they stole from. Even if there’s political will to do this how would you even begin to calculate which artist gets which slice of the cake.

                    The only other course of action within a capitalist framework is literally just ludditism, which might not even be a bad idea short term but in the end it’s still a reactionary position even if it’s grounded in real material concerns.