• SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      In another thread someone linked Nintendo’s patent on mounting a creature and being able to both fly through the air and run along the ground while riding said creature.

      We don’t know what Nintendo is suing about yet, and it’s possible they have something real like they found out that the devs ripped an asset from a pokemon game and tweaked it with AI like a lot of people were speculating at one point, but right now I’m leaning towards this lawsuit is fucked and if Nintendo gets away with it they will be stifling every game with collectable creatures in the industry.

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      To be fair I saw one “Pal” that just straight up used Zoruas model.

      Nintendo never cared about stuff like Digimon or Cassette Beasts, so I’m guessing the problem is actual models made by Nintendo were used. Buuuuut this is Nintendo and they sent people cease and desists over Pokemon fan games FFS, so who the hell knows.

      I mean, Palwords developers are skeezy, but on the other hand so is Nintendo, also fuck copyright.

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They didn’t specify which patents were being infringed upon. It’ll be interesting to see how this goes. It’s in Japan so I assume Nintendo’s got this in the bag

      • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 hours ago

        According to a Mastodon post, the speculation is it’s over “patents such as one for throwing and using Poké Balls in a 3D space (JP,2023-092953,A); and one for automatically switching between ride Pokémon as a player transitions between different terrain, such as between air and the ground (JP,2023-092954,A)."

        IANAL, certainly not in Japanese patent law, but the first one sounds stronger to me, but still not bulletproof.

          • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            AFAIK game mechanics in the US can’t be patented, especially board games. It’s one of the few things American copyright law isn’t fucking stupid about.

          • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            41
            ·
            10 hours ago

            the idea of patents were sold to us with this romantic tale of the lone inventor being able to live off his genius.

            none of that is real. patents are absurd and should be abolished, just like copyright (sold to us with a similar fairytale).

            • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              9 hours ago

              The fundamental flaw with patents is being transferrable and the property model of them. Within the context of the current political economy, it would make more sense if someone used another’s patent commercially, the patent holder just gets a tax credit equal to some small percentage of the sales. And sweet Jesus the entire concept of being able to buy and sell patent rights is fucked up.🔝

        • Roonerino [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That latter one is interesting because I can think of multiple MMOs with mounts that worked that way long before Nintendo did it. But I guess Nintendo is the only company that bothered to patent it in Japan.