It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?

  • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    246
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The problem is that when you push an object, the push happens at the speed of sound in that object. It’s very fast but not anywhere near the speed of light. If you tapped one end of the stick, you would hear it on the moon after the wave had traveled the distance.

    For example, the speed of sound in wood is around 3,300 m/s so 384,400/3,300 ~= 32.36 hours to see the pole move on the moon after you tap it on earth.

    • Metostopholes@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      12 days ago

      Your math is off. The Moon is about 384,400 KILOmeters from the Earth, not meters. So 116,485 seconds, or a bit over 32 hours.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I swear I’ve seen a video of someone timing the speed of pushing a very long pole to prove this very thing. If I can find it I’ll post it here.

      *Found it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqhXsEgLMJ0 I can’t speak to the rigorousness of the experiment, but I remember finding it enlightening.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        It’s also why rocket nozzles can’t be infinitely thin :)

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            There are multiple forces at work in a converging rocket nozzle:

            1. The exhaust is pushed outward faster since the hole is smaller, giving the rocket extra thrust
            2. The exhaust hits the wall of the nozzle as it gets thinner, braking the rocket

            These two effectively cancel out, which is why the actual effect of making the nozzle thinner/converge is that it increases the back pressure within the engine (constricted space, smaller hole), essentially (idk how) increasing the efficiency of the fuel burning.

            However, when the nozzle gets too thin, the exhaust becomes faster than its speed of sound. Since the pressure travels at the speed of sound, it can now not actually get back into the engine anymore. So that’s the limit of how thin you can make the nozzle. The pressure has to get back into the engine to have its effect, so you can’t make the exhaust travel faster than its speed of sound.

            If any of this sounds wrong to anyone, let me know, I’m not an expert in this.