• gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is unfair to chamberlain tbh, history obviously given him a bad reputation, but it was less than 20 years since the the first world War, the bloodiest conflict in history, where 750,000 Brits died. The people wanted any possible alternative to going through that again. As well as Britain desperately needing more time to re-arm, as it had to cover the possibility (eventuality) of a global war on 3 fronts, that Britain could not realistically afford to do after the great slump.

    He’s also the one that gave hitler the ultimatum over Poland and in the end declaring war against Hitler.

    If anything Chamberlain’s legacy should be the reamerment of Britain and specifically hid commitment to the RAF who’s budget he increased from £16m at the start of his Premiership to £105m by the start of the war. Without which we would have almost certainly lost the battle of Britain and, ironically enough, had him labelled as a war monger in Britain at the time.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      It wasn’t even just that he was committed to the RAF. He also resisted the entreaties of Britain’s own version of the “bomber mafia”, a group of RAF officers and industrialists who felt that the key to winning a future war was to build enormous fleets of bombers and take the war to Germany, and to hell with producing defensive fighters. Chamberlain instead made sure that Britain had enough modern fighters (Hurricanes and Spitfires) to beat off Germany’s bombers during the Battle of Britain. Whether or not Hitler ever could have invaded England is debatable, but it was completely impossible without the air supremacy that British fighters successfully prevented Germany from ever achieving.

  • whaleiam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is an old man. Only thinking of himself. He shouldn’t represent anyone. No taxation without representation. The rich are stealing our money.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    This man is out of his mind.
    And/or he just wants to keep his fortune.

    I leave it to the reader to decide.

  • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Old twats in position of power, times change faster now, there need to be term limits and a banning of stock trading for these positions.

    And for the love of God abolish qualified immunity.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I have quit the Democratic Party today. I just changed my registration.

    Yes, I won’t be able to vote in their primaries in my state but it’s not like that helped at all.

    Fuck em. If they don’t have any loyalty to the party why the fuck should I?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We are in a first past the post voting system. Your actions only make sense in a ranked choice voting system. We don’t have that.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I can still vote in general elections for whoever I want.

        Heck, maybe they’ll listen to me more because I’m an independent voter in a swing state and not someone who they can take for granted as a party member.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s almost four million Democrats in my state. My influence is so dilute that it’s practically homeopathic. I’m fine giving that up.

            If anything, being an independent voter in a swing state gives me more influence than being a loyal Democrat.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m sure Schumer and his ilk will thank you. Now they won’t even have to pretend to care what you want etc.

      I mean I get it. Current leadership is absolutely shit. Though I’m not sure why the right solution to that is to give up your voice and let them have power easier. Honestly I’m going to stay in the party and call them out louder. I’m not a Democrat anyhow I’m just in the party as an opposition to Republicans, and the fact there is no real Anarchist party. For obvious reasons. So why not have my voice heard and have what little bit of influence I can.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        If they pretended to care they wouldn’t have done a lot of shit.

        They literally do not care, and have told me as such in many form letters sent after I contacted their offices.

        For 25 years I’ve tried to have my little voice heard and it’s been ignored at best and ridiculed at worst.

        I’m through pretending to be a democrat so assholes can take advantage of me and insult me when I dare to question them.

        And finally: Fuck John Fetterman

        • crank0271@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I don’t blame you at all. Is the Working Families Party at all active near you? They have a reasonable presence in NY (which, admittedly, is where Schumer is). I find that they represent my values much better than the Democratic Party, and I’ve enjoyed the people I’ve met through them.