

Yep! Thank you for sharing, I’ll look further into it!
Yep! Thank you for sharing, I’ll look further into it!
I believe the Fediverse needs an automated way for the sign up process, something users don’t have to think excessively about. I don’t believe that just recommending the flagship instance is enough to foster adoption. The same behavior Nextcloud proposes could be useful: https://nextcloud.com/sign-up/
It means to have list of trusted instances, and therefore defining the collective criteria for deciding when an instance can be classified as trusted. I guess the Fediverse community can find a common understanding, as was done for the Fedipact
Grazie per la condivisione. Immaginavo ci fosse un tema di autenticazione e qualche certificate authority dietro… Ma quindi significa che non ci sono soluzione selfhostabili che possono essere collegate ad una banca? Cioè, la soluzione è creare una organizzazione che si fa rilasciare un certificato per conto di utenti terzi e vende in sostanza il servizio PSD2 solo come intermediario??
Ultimamente mi è stato consigliato Ghost come CMS. Qualcuno lo ha provato? Che voi sappiate esistono modi facili facili di importare/traslare su Ghost parte del tema usato in Wordpress e relativi post?
Ciao, domandina: ma Firefly consente di collegarsi con la propria banca? In ottica Open Banking / PSD2? Sarebbe comodo per avere più conti e le rispettive transazioni registrate automaticamente
confused sounds
RSS feeds are the way to go to keep in touch with events, but only when you want to and in a not addictive manner. Also, my philosophy is that some news is really really important only if somebody from my inner circle personally tells me something about it. Otherwise is just noise from media
And how does it help new users choose a server to sign up to?
Sorry, but I still don’t understand how exactly PieFed supposedly has a better onboarding and helping new users choose a server. Am I missing something?
We have been using the audio/video calls feature for no the now. We are currently on version 9.11.7
The NGI Forum just concluded: https://ngi.eu/
How would a federated internet look like?
Are there any bulk suppliers or retail owners in this community? In particular fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) are a major element in almost everybody’s life and can be used to send a very strong signal. Imagine if all rural stores in a particular area started only selling European stuff. We need those providers here and have a solid business plan for them to adopt such goods, it needs to be economically feasible
Probably your instance is not federated yet with makertube. Try after a few days, as your search might have triggered a discovery
I totally agree. We have a file for each chapter. We might just keep a trunk based approach mainly, and resort to short lived branches to allow writers to get their contributions reviewed.
Thank you for the advice
We opted for each file as a chapter. We already have the general structure. We are wondering what is the best approach. Maybe we should not have branches at all(?)
To be honest, in the beginning, I started with a branch for my own version of some chapters. We thought it was ok and merged into main. Maybe if we are going to use branches at all, having a branch for each author could make sense. We need to discuss this
This is great advice. I don’t believe we need a “stable” version. I mean, at a certain point our work will be ready and that’s it. We are not going to have different releases. We will have other formats (like a shorter version of this report), but in that case those would live as a different repository I guess
Like which providers?