Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because people need to eat.

      Also, some air travel is essential.

      Or do you want to stop medical couriers from delivering organs for transplant?

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Lol the idea of a medical courier waiting in line at the TSA rummaging through their organ containers because they flagged it sus in the x-ray machine.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you trying to imply…that the medical couriers …are transporting …food?

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yeah but implying that medical couriers are selling their payloads on a cannibal black market is juicer than a fat mans liver.

            With some fava beans.

            And a nice chianti.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They are only doing it in the first place because they need to eat

        Or do you want to stop medical couriers from delivering organs for transplant?

        The rich would give in long before this and have the mattered settled in an emergency meeting because they have places they want to go

            • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes, but private airports, or airstrips, exist and probably have little to no TSA involvement. Some guy nearby lands his helicopter in his back yard.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You one comment ago:

          Doesn’t it make more sense to shutdown US airports?

          You this comment:

          The rich would give in long before this and have the mattered

          Which is it? Does it make sense to shut down U.S. airports or is that something that wouldn’t happen?

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            How are you confused on that

            If they were to announce airport shutdowns then the budget would be passed to prevent that

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You didn’t say announce a shutdown. If you meant announce it and not actually do it, you sure weren’t clear about that since you said it would make sense to do it.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I get it, but having people feel bad for the TSA of all organizations is a tall order. Why not pick a less controversial gov agency effected like say the National Parks and Museums?

    • somethingp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Probably because parks and museums usually just close whenever this happens, so they’re not working without pay. They’re just on an indefinite suspension

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And yet I can feel for them more, If the TSA was gone tomorrow I could not care.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The way it setup it will not mean the removal of the stupid safety theater, it will mean the closing of the airport.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I know, and that makes me even less inclined to have sympathy for the TSA as a whole. I know I should feel bad for the people working at the TSA, but I can’t.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How bout they just dont show up? The TSA is a fraudulent agency anyway. Pre-9/11 security worked just fine.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And if someone is going to hijack a plane to pilot it into a building, i doubt their mission would depend on a large tube of toothpaste and a nail clipper

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Heh heh heh, finally, I can sneak enough explosive toothpaste into the plane!”

        That’s the terrorists right now, how do you feel now, huh? It’s not a joke. TSA is extremely serious. 😤

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Theater of security isn’t helpful anyway. I say it’s even harmful, as it makes cars more attractive over public transport and get more shit in our lungs as result.

    • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I can’t imagine coming in to work if I’m not being paid on time. Indeed, if there’s even a whiff of maybe I won’t get paid, I’m not coming in unless I’m paid in advance.

      Every government worker that is told they’re not getting paid should do that. Money in my account now, before I come in to work.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Love this attitude. The harsh reality is, not everyone is a kid working at maccas and they have families to feed and bills to pay.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not much difference toward feeding family or paying bills if you’re not getting paid. Better to take the time off and find a new job.

          • Woht24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            True, but isn’t this just late payment? It’s still absolutely abhorrent and I’d be fucking furious, I’m just saying a lot of people aren’t in a position to just leave. Getting paid a week late is better than losing your pay for 2-4 weeks while you look for another job.

            • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              There is no guarantee that they will get paid. For that to happen, congress will have to pass a spending bill that not only authorized future spending but also explicitly gives back pay for the time they were working without paying after the shutdown.

              So far this has always happened, but I do remember some noises about not doing it around the last shutdown.

              So especially after those comments last time, there is no certainty that if you come in to work for the government during a shutdown you will be paid.

              There’s a reason the country lost credit rating, and it’s because people are slightly less confident that it will actually pay its debts, including simple payroll.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The more I think about it, the more I can see this is a really good example of Hanlon’s razor.

        If they were evil, they would not tell you they’re not paying you. They simply wouldn’t pay you. They’re actually stupid because they told people they expect them to work without getting paid.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ok, but they can’t: for TSA not working is their job description. They work by not working.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did we not abolish the TSA yet? Funny how we’re always losing ground on everything.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      He’s legally a US citizen by way of his mother.

      Nevermind how much “god damn those evil foreigners are at it again” rhetoric makes me gag. Peter Thiel and Marc Andressen are fully American and they suck just as hard. If anything, the problem isn’t Elon, its Stanford University and the endless line of factory produced insane far-right techbro degenerates that it rolls out which gave us our modern hellscape.

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Musk and Trump showed me, that I don’t have to think about being a good enough person… Obviously I easily am (it’s enough not to kill/rape/extort,… who would have thought it’s so easy?)

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember when the goverment was first shut down in a long time, if ever before, when Republicans thought it would be a good ratfucker move to harm Obama’s presidency, and it blew up in their faces, and our Country went from a AAAA rated borrower to a AAA borrower due to government disfunction? We seriously need a law that prevents this stupid shit from happening again. Maybe if they don’t pass funding, we just renew the last passed funding. It pisses me off so much. Imagine getting paid a significant amount of tax payer money, a life long sipend, and better health care than most the county, and not even doing your job and letting the goverment shut down. At some point here the lawlessness is going to convince enough people that it seriously doesn’t matter anymore.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      We seriously need a law that prevents this stupid shit from happening again. Maybe if they don’t pass funding, we just renew the last passed funding

      What we do in Australia is of the government can’t pass a budget we dissolve the government and go for elections.
      Clearly the MP are not doing their jobs so make them run for their jobs again.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That works in a parliamentary system, because the state and the government are two different things. In the U.S. system, they are functionally the same thing. We can’t dissolve the government, or we’d have to rebuild the entire state apparatus from the ground up.

    • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why doesn’t the “no new wars!” gang cut military spending by 65-80%? Defense readiness doesn’t cost $800B/ year.

    • nlgranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe if they don’t pass funding, we just renew the last passed funding.

      This is exactly what happened a few days ago in France. While it’s not perfect, it’s still a whole lot better than a shutdown.

  • resin85@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And they ripped out funding for pediatric cancer research. $250 million… or around 0.05% of president Musk’s net worth. Why do repubs hate kids with cancer?

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      They want to strip away everything that reduces infant mortality, so that people start having more kids again since so many of them will die young.

      Then later they give it back, and since they already took away the right to abortion… Boom, population explosion and a bunch of poor kids are born to later be exploited in factories and wars.

        • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you don’t want to have an abortion, no one’s ever been forcing you.

          Why you think it’s appropriate to force others is weird.

            • WolfingHour@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Nah, you don’t really believe that.

              You already know that in an abortion, no one is typically killing the fetus (which btw is less of a human than a chicken egg is human), they’re just removing it from the body it’s parasiting off of. Not the mother’s fault it can’t survive, and I’m pretty sure you’re for curing cancer or tape worm which also contain more human dna than a fetus does.

              Besides, in many cases the fetus is already dead or terminal anyway.

              And even if this was codified under law as murder, it wouldn’t be the mother doing it, but a licensed professional, much like police, soldiers or wardens.

              Thats’s a lot of mental gymnastics to insert yourself into someone’s health care and sex life. That’s kind of weird…

              • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Republicans have spread this myth that women use abortion like birth control. Just like the myth of the black welfare Queen, spitting out kids just to draw a check. It’s all bullshit and they know it, they just hate poor people.

              • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                tape worm which also contain more human dna than a fetus does.

                Not that im disagreeing with your overall argument, but a fetus has 100% human dna… otherwise it wouldnt develop into a human lol

                • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  A fetus does indeed have 100% human DNA, but a tape worm has about 70% human DNA.

                  An 8 week fetus is about 20 g, an 8 week tape worm can become up to 30 ft, weighing several pounds. 70 % of a pound is more than 20 g.

                  And with the new slave mother laws, the fetus isn’t more than a handful of grams at the cut off date, making it all the more poignant.

            • GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Okay, I don’t agree with the emotional concept that a fetus is a person innately, but I can at least understand where that type of thinking comes from. Claiming it’s a fully-developed human is just demonstrably wrong. You’re entitled to your opinion, but feelings aren’t facts. I sincerely hope this is a sad attempt at trolling.

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Claims science, states no actual science, strawmans up an example that isn’t related to the original in any way. claims gaslighting with no actual reference to gaslighting behavior.

                  No slurs or personal attacks, but i feel like you’re going for the subtle approach so you probably don’t need those right now.

                  Hmm, so this is up there, i feel like it’s missing something though, can’t quite place what, but i’ll keep an eye on the replies in case i spot it.

                  Anyway, 8/10 shitpost, good job, no notes.


                  While i have you, it sounds like you are a person familiar with how science works and will give me an actual answer rather than deflect.

                  What is the scientific definition of “parasite”?

                • medgremlin@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  What is your solution for fetal anomalies that will inevitably lead to stillbirth or death in the first few hours of life? What is your solution for pregnancy abnormalities that put the life of the mother at serious risk? What is your solution for women who are desperately trying to escape monstrously abusive relationships that got pregnant from marital rape or coercion?

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Do you believe people who are unresponsive and comatose for a long period should be kept alive despite the families wishes?

            • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              A fetus is objectively not fully formed. What do you think its doing in the womb for all those months, just hanging out? When abortions happen its just a bundle of cells that cant think, breathe, or live on its own.

                • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Cancer

                  Cancer is a bunch of cells. By your logic it is immoral to treat cancer. Cancer has human DNA. Cancer can also live independent of the human that spawned it.

                  We should stop killing cancer too.

                • moonlight@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  A coma involves brain activity in a highly developed nervous system, often with a high chance of recovery.

                  A fetus has a tiny, undeveloped nervous system, with no higher brain functions.

                  These are not at all equivalent. One is a person, and the other is not.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Then how come they can’t survive without leeching off a host? 80% of pregnancies spontaneously end in miscarriage. That doesn’t sound viable or fully developed to me. If it could survive outside the womb, you’d have a point. But it can’t, so you don’t.

              You know who was actually fully-developed? All the women who have died due to pregnancy complications thanks to draconic laws that take away their rights over their own bodies. I’ll hold you responsible for murdering them.

              • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                2 days ago

                You clearly don’t know biology do you & are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ? BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

                • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2020)
                • National Center for Health Statistics. (1999). Trends in Pregnancies and Pregnancy Rates.
                • JAMA Network. (2020)

                I hold you responsible for the billions of deaths of unborn children, because of your stupidity & selfishness & inhumanity

                • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  BTW, it’s around 13.5 percent but regardless it’s not 80% (that’s a lie)

                  Sure, if you only measure after 6 weeks.

                  For women of reproductive age, losses between implantation and clinical recognition are approximately 10–25%. Loss from implantation to birth is approximately one third [39, 46, 48, 49].

                  A recent re-analysis [39] of data from three studies [46, 48, 49] concluded that, in normal healthy women, 10–40% is a plausible range for pre-implantation embryo loss and overall pregnancy loss from fertilisation to birth is approximately 40–60%.

                  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5443340/

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  You clearly don’t know biology do you

                  Says the person claiming a fetus is a fully developed human.

                  are you capable of sustaining yourself I you were left in a jungle ?

                  Millions of people live in the jungles of the world. How many fetuses live outside wombs? Oh right, none. Because there’s a difference between having the skills to survive in the jungle, and being a fully developed human capable of independent biological survival.

                  Have you ensured that every single one of your gametes resulted in a child? Then you’re a genocidal hypocrite.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              No. A fully developed human would be post-pubescent. Until then you are either a fetus incapable of living outside your mother’s body, or a baby capable of independent life with some sort of care.

              Fetuses are NOT babies. Stop being obtuse.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I assume you’ve adopted multiple unwanted children in the foster system including severely disabled ones, right?

          Since you think that “unborn children” shouldn’t be “killed,” you’ve got to be a major part of the solution.

          Tell me about your severely disabled kids you adopted from the foster system.

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh fuck right off with that bullshit. Abortions are a medical procedure. Women have died because they can’t get them. Or should we just let fetuses that die in utero rot inside the womb and kill the poor woman who lost her baby through no fault of her own?

              That’s just one example off the top of my head.

              Nobody wants to or is killing children. That’s some hyperbolic bullshit.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Fair, but I would suggest that married couples who want more than one child should be allowed to choose to have as much sex as they want until they’re ready to have that next child. Of course, anti-abortion crusaders never think about the fact that it isn’t just those dirty sluts getting abortions. Married people have sex too.

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is it too late to abort you? Because you blatantly fail at having a basic grasp on reality.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Whoa whoa whoa you can’t go around funding kids healthcare. Then they are gonna become adult voters who expect more free healthcare.

      You want kids who get to adulthood on the skin of their teeth, or kids who don’t get to adulthood at all. There’s no in-between.