Some Walmart employees say customers are getting hostile at self-checkout — and they blame anti-theft tech::When Walmart’s anti-theft self-checkout tech alerts an employee of a missed scan, it can cause some uncomfortable situations.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    255
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You force me to check out my own groceries. Fine.

    But don’t get pissed when I have a lot of groceries and have to move my bags because you gave me one square foot of space to bag everything. That’s often my biggest frustration. The robot thinks I’m trying to do some shady stuff, and I’m not.

    • IrrerPolterer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      156
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ‘robot’ isn’t the problem. This design is intentional and human made. Here in the Netherlands self checkout is the norm, even in very small grocery stores. However, it’s super easy and not frustrating at all, because the stores TRUST their customers. The self checkout is super simple, you scan a product and put it on your bag, or backpack or whatever you have. No need to weigh the scanned products or anything. Nothing overcomplicated.

      Now there are some control measures, but they are designed in a way to not be too intrusive or create unnecessary frustration: First, most places have a gate at the exit that only lets you leave by scamming your receipt (or if you go paperless, you scan your membership card on your phone). Also, some places do random inspection. But that’s frustration free too - a worker comes up to you with a hand scanner, scans like four or five random items of yours and leaves. Boom, done.

      • shiroininja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        137
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, you can’t trust Americans. They’ll steal your own land out from under you and Rob your grandma and call it good business sense. Saying this as an American.

      • Damage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        However, it’s super easy and not frustrating at all, because the stores TRUST their customers.

        lol, I’ve been at the Albert Heijn near my hotel 3 times and 3 times I had to have my items rescanned. Maybe it’s because I’m not blond and tall?

        • chakan2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          We’re accepting white the Nordic countries are fiercely xenophobic. It changes the game quite a bit.

          • wishthane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            NL is neither a Nordic country nor ethnically homogeneous. Just like all countries with a history of colonizing other people, many of those people are now in NL. Stop blaming everything on diversity

            • chakan2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nice try, but no.

              Dutch 75.4%, EU (excluding Dutch) 6.4%, Turkish 2.4%, Moroccan 2.4%, Surinamese 2.1%, Indonesian 2%, other 9.3% (2021 est.)

      • Thymos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, some places do random inspection. But that’s frustration free too

        Yeah, I’m gonna disagree with that. They’ve recently ramped up those checks because of increased theft due to inflation. They also scan more items now. After having been checked 4 times in a row and them completely emptying my bag each time, I no longer use the self checkout.

        • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A third of these are people who are either disabled or in medical crisis. They’re marked “funny”. And this is where you go for entertainment? Well, when people tell you who they are, believe them.

      • Elbrar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        most places have a gate at the exit that only lets you leave by scamming your receipt

        That would be unlawful detention here. Also, what about people that go in and decide they don’t actually want to buy anything after all?

        Fun fact: You can ignore the receipt checkers at wal-mart in the states. They have no legal authority to require you to stop. Costco, on the other hand, since it’s a membership club, can.

        • SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Costco can stop you from leaving either. They can however revoke your membership for breaking the terms. But if you not longer care about you membership you ignore them like the Walmart checkers

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did that last time I went to Walmart for something. Long line of people waiting to show their receipts and I just walked out.

        • boerbiet@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be unlawful detention here. Also, what about people that go in and decide they don’t actually want to buy anything after all?

          It’s not like you’re trapped… you can just walk out if you want, but doing so without paying and carrying full bags may raise an eyebrow with employees. Although I think I could easily get away with that in my small village supermarket during quiet hours when nobody is paying attention.

    • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t about the weight sensors, it’s using “computer vision” to detect you didn’t scan something and forces employees to get involved.

      All the Walmarts I’ve been to have the bagging area weight sensors turned off. It seems the local grocery store finally turned theirs off because using a reusable bag used to set it off.

      • sartalon@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I got pinged twice, in one visit because I moved shit around, trying to organize.

        Way more false positives, in my opinions.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, those weight systems are so easily defeated, I don’t even get the point. Anything that is measured by unit vs weight can easily be stolen.

    • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use reusable bags. I have to be very slow and deliberate getting the bag ready in the bagging area or it’ll flag me.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use reusable bags too, I first scan and rest the products on the weighting area, and after paying quickly introduce all the products into my bag. It takes a bit longer but it’s way less problems for the workers and me, and it’s still faster than going through the regular checkout.

    • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s just Colorado but the only store I’ve been to that had weight verification was a King Soopers (Kroger in other states)

    • SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t say anything. Not because I care about “muh poor people” but because I actively mind my own business. I would behave the same way if I saw someone steal from a small business as well.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like it depends. Stealing is morally wrong no matter what. But I’d probably act as if I saw nothing if someone just stole a sandwich or similar. I’m not sure I’ll act the same if I see a teenage girl of a family that is obviously very well off steal things like makeup (that one literally bragged about it in front of her parents during a dinner where I was invited).

      • nephs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In our society people are acknowledged as human beings through consumption, and that need is hammered onto our heads by ads and beauty norms everywhere.

        Belonging is a human need. Sometimes some cheap makeup is all it takes.

        But also, the rich people are stealing from us in so much worse ways. A rich teen stealing from a rich corporation is kind of karmaeic, and really, even if she was caught, nothing significant would happen, whilst a poor girl doing the same would suffer a lot more.

        Ergo, if you see something, no you didn’t.

      • Iunnrais@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know that stealing is morally wrong no matter what. My rabbi taught that if a man steals to survive, the crime is not his, but of his community because they did not save him from poverty. That teaching really stuck with me. Yes, stealing indicates something is seriously wrong in the world, but there’s a big difference in where the evil lies— is it in the thief, or in the society?

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As long as it’s just “shoplifting”. Where I’m at, people will come in on a bike with a trash bag, load it up, roll out, and go to the next town over and sell the stuff on the street in the ghetto.

      Since you kids are so sheltered you don’t believe anything like this happens, here it is on video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f8JLIWxxya4

      Also https://www.ktvu.com/news/where-is-sfs-boosted-merchandise-being-fenced-police-say-check-your-local-flea-market

      Tell your moms I said hi, suburb kids

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty common here. A lot of stores have been hiring private security, but if the security intervenes then the thief can sue them.

          • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used to be in security. I couldn’t imagine getting paid a little over minimum wage and giving a shit about theft. The only ones that would were people who took it too goddamn seriously and we called them “tac heads” because they purchased all this tactical gear like the maglights like a fucking billy club and were looking for an excuse to throw down.

            Matter of fact that describes some cops too. Damn is there a serious problem with how we staff enforcement jobs.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let me guess, you live in a safe, lily-white suburb😂

          Poverty breeds crime, but not all crime is of desperation.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago
          • makes the shopping experience shittier for the rest of us (locked merchandise)

          • the syndicates fencing these goods use the money to support actual harmful crimes

          • the people doing the thieving often get violent themselves

          • raises prices and causes store closures

          • people don’t want to work in shitty stores, so the workers they have do the bare minimum (again, worse shopping experience for the rest of us)

          The bazaars where people sell the stolen goods also cause lots of problems.

          • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            NGL I genuinely prefer the bazaars and street markets over the big box stores.

            I take your point with the thieves getting violent. The others, ehh. The big box stores really ought not to be there in the first place and be replaced with little specialized mom and pop joints owned by locals the way life used to be.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay so then we have mom and pops, who can’t absorb the loss, getting their shit stolen. Don’t see how that helps.

              • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then we could have this talk. Then we could debate the morality of it.

                Until that time, stealing from Walmart will always be the ethical thing to do.

      • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re getting ripped off even with a stolen Walmart bike.

        I work at a shop and people call us snobs because we won’t work on those deathtraps

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tell what? All of it’s happening out in the open, the cops just refuse to do anything about it. It’s not like if you tell a cop they’ll be like “oh shit I had no idea, let me go run over there and do my job for once, thank you citizen!”

          To be fair to cops, they’re understaffed and they don’t want to do their jobs for fear of activists suing them. But all of those suits are paid for with tax dollars, so idk why they care, just do your job and if they sue you, they sue you.

          I think it boils down to laziness but with the excuse of being sued.

          • atetulo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Tell what?

            Tell on people who are shoplifting.

            All of it’s happening out in the open

            Then what did you mean by:

            As long as it’s just “shoplifting”

            To me, it seems like you were saying that if you saw people “on a bike with a trash bag, load it up, roll out” then you would snitch, since this comment chain is about not telling on people who are stealing from corporations.

            Please correct me if I’m wrong.

  • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ever since the pandemic, curbside pickup has been the norm at our house for groceries.

    We use Kroger, not Walmart, but I had a recent experience relevant to share.

    I was out running an errand and my spouse asked me to go grab a couple items from Kroger since it was nearby.

    I hadn’t been inside the store in like a year, so I was surprised to see gates at the door that opened and closed upon approach and walking away.

    Also, while shopping, at some point suddenly the wheels on the cart locked up, causing me to bang the ever loving shit out of my shins on the cart frame. That’s when I got to learn about the new “anti-theft” wheel lock tech being used on all carts now.

    I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I wanted to flip the goddamn cart over and kick the absolute shit out of it… but I knew that wouldn’t help.

    …But if I read a story about someone going and drilling holes in every single one of those cart wheels, or setting fire to them all, or breaking the gates, I would laugh.

    I imagine as soon as someone gets something worse than bruised shins and brings a lawsuit against these stupid companies, we will see these stupid things go away… but until then, I’m not fucking stepping foot inside any store that has that bullshit.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      The grocery store in my city became straight dystopian. It was always a sort of sketchy area but nothing that bad. After the pandemic, they added a second armed, vested private security in black, one-way turnstiles going in and out, increased cameras with screens on every aisle that showed you with the words “RECORDING IN PROGRESS”. They even added locks to the frozen section, so you had to get an employee to help you buy ice cream. The police and security would tackle clearly unwell people who were shoplifting food, face pushed into the concrete type of thing.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The police and security would tackle clearly unwell people who were shoplifting food, face pushed into the concrete type of thing.

        Cops can generally get away with that. Store security guards assaulting customers open the store up to a lawsuit.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, the store security usually didn’t actually do anything, the police would be doing that while the security talks to them, but on two occasions I did see the security tackle a person.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The “bad” grocery store near me has taken to posting security cam pictures of people they catch stealing which is a terrible, awful, extrajudicial thing to do, but I would be lying if I said it does not make for some hilarious pictures. It’s a big wall of shame right as you enter the store.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jesus Christ that all sounded (unfortunately) normal until the locked freezers. That’s a step too far. I mean, all of it is, but that’s actually a ridiculous concept lmao

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wonder if that’s a response to that stupid internet trend of opening ice cream containers to lick it and then put it back.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty funny to think, living in the US, nothing is odd about a privately employed person with a gun guarding groceries or people being violently arrested when they steal said groceries out of necessity.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My wife’s creepy racist incel uncle had a fit once when we went into a store and he saw himself on the security camera. He said he doesn’t like seeing himself. My sister had the same reaction to seeing herself pre transition and apparently it’s a common theme among trans people who haven’t realized it yet.

        I know it’s a bit of a tangent, but he’s rabidly transphobic up to the point just short of being blatantly hateful. He’s obsessed with my sister and other trans people and made a lot of obsessive and creepy jokes about dating them.

        This post triggered my PTSD.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s more a body dysmorphia thing than specifically a trans thing. For instance, I hate seeing myself too, and I’m just fat, not trans. I disapprove of the appearance I have, and dislike being reminded of that. Yes, I’m working on it.

          • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            He’s a completely out of shape incel, so that’s a possibility. Considering everything else, he seems deep in the closet. He started mentioning trans stuff all the time before he found out that my sister is trans, which caused him to have an existential crisis, because he was obsessed with her and trying to get her to date him. He also has a creepy latent obsession with Russian women. He constantly talked about other trans women and joked about dating them and went through an entire hypothetical situation of introducing a specific trans woman he was obsessed with to his family.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised it locked up like that. About 15 years ago I was a frequent customer in a store that had these and I never encountered any problem with it, nor did I hear of anyone else encountering a malfunction while using them.

      That store implemented those locks because they were the closest supermarket to a college campus. Some students were taking the carts back to their dorms and chaining them up to a tree with bicycle chains. They would also use those carts to go shopping in a nearby supermarket of another store chain.

      Different continent though, so it’s probably not entirely the same technology. People like reinventing the wheel.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        My wife once ordered some dried basil or similar herb, they said they were out of stock and substituted it with an actual live potted basil plant. We both thought it was hilarious, but also annoying.

  • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some loss is the expected result of replacing workers with customers. Even cashiers who are paid and trained to check out customers have a failure rate of about 1%. Walmart treating their customers like criminals for things that routinely happen to even their own trained and incentived employees is ridiculous.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d get hostile too. This wastes literally everyone’s time, employee and customer. Walmart and other companies already write off all their losses as tax write offs. It would actually be more cost efficient to do literally nothing. But it’s not about preventing theft. It’s about proving a point: that corporations control you.

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll call for their manager and attack the manager specifically. Is there a term for that yet?

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry but I don’t think that makes very much sense.

      Retail theft is a real problem for a company’s bottom line. Enough so that Target is pulling out of San Francisco, IIRC. And self-checkout is one of the easiest ways to pull it off.

      Why would a corporation frantically seeking quarter over quarter growth spend money to “prove a point” about control?

      • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Enough so that Target is pulling out of San Francisco, IIRC

        https://www.businessinsider.com/target-closing-stores-due-to-crime-stats-tell-another-story-2023-10?op=1

        ehhhhhhhhhhhhh. They’re blaming theft, but that’s not it. Theft might be a part of it, but the stats nearby contradict that. We don’t have access to their internal theft metrics, but the city data doesn’t pan out. When there are stores (mission district) that have higher theft and are staying open, then is it really theft?

        Or is it poor retail performance since WFH is the new king and people live in the suburbs more than in the city. When continue to order online more and more instead of shop at a physical store.

        Theft is an easy way to blame other people without providing evidence. It’s not the CEO’s failure to adapt to changing market conditions, it’s the poors! It’s their fault! /s

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ll never understand why people like you care about a mega corporation’s bottom line. The executives are still making billions, while keeping their employees as poor as they can get away with.

        Target will survive without San Francisco. Even if they fail, the top dogs will just liquidate and take a fat paycheck home, enough for a 1000+ employees to retire and live off of for the rest of their lives, and they’ll just pocket it all. Fuck 'em.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t give a flying fuck about a megacorporation’s bottom line. Fuck Walmart. Fuck Target. I don’t disagree with a single thing you just said.

          I just didn’t think it made any sense to say that they made an expensive change to their self-checkout just to “prove a point” about controlling people.

          But apparently no one knows how to read. And once some of you saw downvotes you knew everything you needed to know about what I think.

      • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So is CEO greed though. And they could choose to use that money to balance their budget, not ruin my experience of being out and about.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, they absolutely could and should. That wasn’t my point. I just don’t think it makes any sense to say that they made the change to their self checkout to “prove a point” about controlling people.

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey remember when they gave you free bags, bagged it for you, and rang you up? That was kinda nice. Now the price is three times as high and all that service stuff is gone. The day before Thanksgiving is going to be hell this year at my supermarket

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those free plastic bags deteriorate into toxic materials that are presently all over the inside of your body. You had to wait in a slow line for people to bag the wrong things together and sometimes scan the same thing twice. Now I have my own canvas bags that last forever, I never scan my things twice, and my shit is bagged with the right things together based on where they go in my home.

      • Clegko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Switching from single use plastic to multi-use plastic has greatly increased carbon emissions of production. You also have to reuse the new plastic bags over 100 times for them to break even, emissions wise. (https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2020/04/30/plastic-paper-cotton-bags/)

        I agree with you that canvas bags are better overall, but IMO we should move back to paper. It’s WAY easier to reuse paper products, gardeners love the paper bags, and they break down quickly even if they are littered somewhere. There are some tradeoffs, such as transportation costs being higher because they are thicker than single use bags, but if you compare paper to multi-use bags, it’s a fairly moot point.

        Also, I’d still rather someone bag my shit for me. I’ve had so many things broken or otherwise damaged by the cashier haphazardly tossing my stuff into the cart just so I can walk 5 foot and take 10 minutes to pack my own stuff. Personal preference, but it should be given as an option imo.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        My body is fine but thank you for your “sincere” concern.

        I went on the fast lines, maybe you need help with this. The trick is to look for lines that are shorter not longer. Easy mistake to make.

        I never had an issue with the cashier making a mistake and I have never been so freaken insane that I need to have the items in my bag in the reverse order of removal. Maybe they made so many mistakes scanning you because they were distracted by your fugly bag and advice on what order to put things in. You don’t want to waste a single half second of your life putting groceries away. That could add up over an entire lifetime to a whole minute or so!

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Like a lot of the crap in your body that is hurting you its not obvious until you get a health issue or cancer later and then noticeable statistically not individually EG you look at two populations and one had more folks with a much higher incidence of cancer or auto immune diseases or what have you. The fact that its not obvious doesn’t make it any less real. Those free bags were closer to free cigarettes.

          I used to manage cashiers and handled 10 of thousands of transactions and observed more. Like any human beings they do occasionally make mistakes. If you haven’t noticed anyone EVER making a mistake ringing you up it means you don’t pay attention.

          I don’t tell cashiers how they should bag things because that’s obnoxious but I do know that I do a better job of not putting fresh things with meat or things that are liable to be squished with canned food or all the non-food items together.

          If you avoid 4 minutes waiting once per week and 2 minutes putting away things over your life you will save over 300 hours. You aren’t liable to be awake for much more than 100 hours a week so that is like 3 weeks of your life.

    • smolyeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t remember the last time I let someone ring me up at Walmart. Self checkout was always faster because most of the attended registers were closed. Most of my adult life I’ve bagged myself and idk if I’d want to go back tbh. The tech is annoying to deal with though

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trust me it was nice. Value adds keep going down and prices keep going up. Keep hearing how everyone is unemployed and how CEO pay keeps rising. Biggest shareholder of Walmart has a mega yacht, maybe could have spent some of that money hiring people at the register.

        Whatever, enshitification continues. Now if you excuse me I want to watch a fifteen second yt vid and will have to watch a 30 second ad first from some alt-right “news” service that hates trans people.

        • smolyeet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ahh yes the value of getting something for free for almost 2 decades goes down the moment they actually want people to watch the ads or ask people to pay.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can’t even count the number of Epoch Times ads I have gotten telling me how the media invented trans people. I keep blocking them but they keep coming back. Do you support that ad as well? How about the Prague-U ones where a woman explains how the Southern Strategy is a myth? This morning I got one about the Turtle Twins, the author explained how slavery wasn’t really all that bad.

    • AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you are going to go on the day before, I’d recommend doing your shopping at 5:00am and be done by 06:00 am. That’s when the day shift comes in. I wouldn’t bring a cartful of groceries to the check stands before that time though, nite crew will be stressing out.

    • Techmaster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They even used to bring your groceries out to your car, put them in your trunk, and return the cart for you.

      • atetulo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh. Shop wherever you get the best deal.

        Getting screwed over by someone locally isn’t better than getting screwed over by someone miles away unless you’re a tool.

        • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You understand why Walmart is able to charge so little for shit? Their workers are paid garbage (a lot have to supplement their wages with food stamps), they buy in such crazy volume that they can undercut mom and pop places with impossible margins and they drive local businesses under. I hope the deals are worth it

          Amusingly the 2 Walmarts in my city closed due to crazy shoplifting. I’m not sad to see them go, but they left a massive crater in the shopping center where NOTHING needs that much space and I can’t see anybody moving in anytime soon. Sadly they’ve chased smaller places out of the area already so shopping options are limited

          • atetulo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Walmart workers are paid comparably to workers at Kroger and Target.

            Walmart is able to charge low prices because they make up for it in volume. They make up for it in volume because they charge the lowest prices.

            I hope the deals are worth it

            It is. If mom and pop stores want to stay in business, they can take a hit to their paychecks so customers have a better deal. If they aren’t willing to do that, then they shouldn’t get to stay in business. It is business, after all. I’m not getting ripped off just to be nice to someone local, lol.

              • floppade [he/him]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah I don’t think they get that countered their own point. All of em are corporate places that are cheap and pay shit.

                • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The one corporate retail chain I’d give a pass to is Costco. They show that it is completely possible for all of these larger chains to compensate their employees fairly.

        • comfy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The best deal is always free. So, I’d rather inconvenience the conglomerate haute-booj than the petit-booj, even if it’s only a few dollars.

          • atetulo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The best deal is always free.

            What are you talking about? Who told you that and why do you spout it as though it’s a law of the universe?

            No, the best deal is not ‘always free.’ That’s the kind of soundbite that’s appropriate for republicans.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe they should keep some non-self check registers open then. I was a grocery store cashier in high school and college and I got $20/hour for doing it (adjusted for inflation). Right now if I see a store only has self-check open I will walk out, what I want to do is start tracking my time then mailing in a 1099 and an invoice for my time.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The last few times I’ve walked into a Walmart, the place has been a disaster.

    Shelves empty and in disarray, no evidence that they ever did carry the product I was after, the building in an increasing state of disrepair.

    I’m done with this company.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d never think to harass the poor employee who has nothing to do with the store managenent’s decisions…

    However, when I’m pissed or tired I’ll sometimes be rough or sloppy with the machine, and I get pissed if they have too few manned checkouts for how crowded a store is. Banging items against the scanner glass, tap selections on the touch screen forcefully with my ring etc.

    To keep the self-checkout machines company, I’ll act like a machine too. If I unsuccessfully attempt to scan something, after 5 tries I “timeout” and move onto the next item.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      I give 60 seconds for someone to come fix the self checkout when it fucks up. If no one is available, I’m taking my shit and leaving. I tried to pay, fuck you I don’t have time for this.

      • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried to pay, fuck you I don’t have time for this.

        Lol, uh huh. Whatever you gotta tell yourself to justify stealing that bag of doritos, dude.

        • Mafflez@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not gonna cry for a corporation that doesn’t give a fuck if you eat or not. Why are you?

          • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not “crying” for any corporations. I’m laughing at that jackass for their asinine rationalization for shoplifting. If you don’t understand the difference, I don’t know what to tell you.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re not crying for them, you’re licking their boots

              You’re free to do so, of course, and we’re free to laugh at your dumb ass paying full price for $20 steaks that were only half as much three years ago.

              • haventbeenlistening@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Lemmy sure attracts some fucking characters. The guy simply pointed out that stealing isn’t justified by a 60-second wait. And you are jumping in here ranting about the price of steak for some reason. You’re not Robin Hood. You’re just a dumbass with a keyboard.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Tell us you’re not listening without telling us you’re not listening

                  This dumbass with a keyboard knows their worth and knows it is rarely if ever worth it to pay full price for stuff. Especially expensive necessities, for example meat, for which the prices skyrocketed thanks to the lockdowns and aren’t going back down because of the horrifyingly astounding greed of big corps like Walmart who largely control the market.

                  Hence, stealing stuff like that from Walmart is justified.

                  Hell, it’s justified simply because it is Walmart, but that is the more detailed justification.

                  It doesn’t matter either way, though, because people are going to keep doing it regardless of what you think.

                  So carry on, dumbass keyboard warrior. The only one you’re hurting is you. 😎

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s unethical and I personally wouldn’t do that…

        …but in your situation practically speaking, if no one’s going to come and fix the machine in that amount of time, then who would be there to stop you just walking out with your goods?

      • Stuka@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sureee you will.

        No, you’ll stand there and look around annoyed like everyone else, all yourre saying is youre gonna be a dick to whoever has the misfortune of helping you.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve done it several times lol

          One time I’ve gotten a “hey you can’t do that” but in my area the guards aren’t allowed to stop you. Which imo is a dumb rule but it allows me to do this.

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s gone further here… we have shops with scanners so you scan the goods as you go around… in theory speeding up checkout but…

    1. 25% of the time you end up selected for ‘random check’ so an employee has to come and rescan everything anyway
    2. If there are any ‘restricted’ items a like painkillers, a different employee has to come over and allow them.

    Given the chronic understaffing meaning you’re basically in a queue for attention, it frequently takes longer to get through the ‘rapid’ checkouts than it would if I simply queued up and got someone else to do it. But as far as the supermarket thinks they’re winning as they pay fewer people.

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Companies only want to shift to self checkout because they think they’ll make more money.

      It’s all about profit.

      I was fooled, I thought it was going to be better for me. And it was for awhile, because I can check myself out faster than the average employee.

      However, the average customer sucks at checking themselves out. So the line for self checkout sucks. Stores use scales to make sure you’re scanning the right number of things, but that means that I have to put everything down on a tray, and then put it back in my cart after.

      Worst of all, I check out so fast that I regularly get stopped because I guess I look like a thief. No, I didn’t steal anything, I just don’t want to waste any more of my precious time in this depressing fluorescent establishment.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can tell who’s never worked as a cashier because they take fucking forever to check out

      • arefx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My local grocery market solved the problem of customers sucking by just adding more self checkout and it worked I think. I don’t know I go even when it’s super busy and never have to wait and if I do it’s for like 20 seconds. Wegmans for what it’s worth . Overall the quality of Wegmans has gone down though the past few years.

    • TheLight@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the store policy making the experience suck.

      Random checks at Kaufland (European supermarket chain) only require the employee to visually inspect your cart to see if you scanned everything and they only need to rescan like four items, to verify the employee actually took the time to check instead of just waving you through, so it’s all very fast.

      Also, all employees can clear restricted items, so that’s fast too. My only gripe is that alcohol-free beer also triggers the age verification, but that’s a minor issue.

      I love the hand scanners since thanks to them wonky scales and weight limits are a thing of the past. They really make checkout faster, as long as the store isn’t using them in a boneheaded way.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s not the system that bugs me. It’s the amount of time it takes for the employees to actually come and get the shit going smoothly again. Even when it’s pretty dead in the store, it can take an extraordinary long time before one of the employees watching the area actually comes over when the light is flashing red and I’m trying to get their attention.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ran 8 of the damn things a decade or so ago and I was damn fast. I feel really let down every time I check out with one both with how none of the problems have been resolved and also with how the operators seem to be sleeping with their eyes open.

    • 2000mph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah in most places I’ve shopped they don’t even have staff covering the self checkouts so they obviously don’t care that much.

  • guywithoutaname@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about you, but I get annoyed that I still can’t use NFC at checkout. It’s 2023, tap to pay has been around in the US since 2016 and much longer in Europe.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really is stupid cause literally every business accepts NFC payments now. Even gas pumps. But not Walmart.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        From an employee I talked to it’s because they have a specific contract with the payment processor and it requires using specific payment devices that are covered in the contract and they don’t want off it for as long as possible because it gives them preferential fees.
        So until the cost of business lost is enough to cover increased payment processing fees, don’t expect to see tap to pay.

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It definitely cost them my business at least twice when I forgot my wallet and remembered they don’t take NFC so I went across the street to target.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why don’t you just go to Target first? You can get all your crap ahead of time and just pickup the order. Their prices are super low to compete with Walmart and they price match. Right now it’s basically Walmart with better customers.

            • Psythik@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The main* reason why people go to Target is because they’re willing to spend a bit more to not have to shop at Walmart. Not everyone can afford that luxury.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I left my cart in the checkout lane once because of this. I forgot my wallet, but had my phone with my wallet app. They are actively refusing to implement tap to pay in order to drive people to their app. Not happening.

    • MinguPingu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They want you to use Walmart Pay in the Walmart app. That’s the only contactless way you can pay there. It’s not horrible but you need have an Internet connection to use it.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All the retail shops that were built 20+ years ago have a ton of un-peopled check-out stands. My local grocery store. My bank branches. The hardware store.

    Companies have reduced their staffing to two or three checkers and a self-checkout line.

    We’re doing the work for them. They’re hoarding the profits. It’s a mess.

    My local BofA branch has twelve or thirteen checker stations and I’ve never seen more than two people at the counter. I don’t know when the branch was built, but it was clearly at a time when the semblance of customer service existed. Now, long lines and poor service are normalized and the idea that you’d shop around for a better experience is non-existent.

    • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were never intended to have 100% of the teller/check stands open.

      It’s for surge and holidays, if you go in on Black Friday or other super busy times, you’ll see a vast majority opened.

      It also makes counting easier, if 1 person uses a drawer and it’s off, it’s easier to hold a person accountable, rather than if 5 people used it

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        As someone who used to have to fix tills, this is both true and not right.

        Yes most larger retailers have more tills then they plan on having open outside of say Xmas, and also to allow for some to be down and not effect over all sales. But also no (started years ago) that you will see even on the most busy days of the year most of the lanes open.

        I would say about 10 years ago with express and self checkout the big retailers gave up on hiring enough people to use all the forward tills and I think moved to the idea that people will wait on those busy days. I watched stores be built with less and less lane capacity and have less and less dedicated cashiers. Like a lot of companies retail giants see payroll a tempting place to make cuts on and after covid they have learned (hopefully incorrectly) that people will put up with a lot more BS then was expected years ago.

    • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Abolish the minimum wage laws.

      Computers are cheaper than employees, so this is where we have come.