The problem with japanese live-action is that they try to transpose the source material (manga or whatever) as is (dialogs, character designs, etc), but this will usually be kinda cringy… You mentioned Alice in borderland which I watched and enjoyed, but that is because of the story, while It was just barely watchable on every other aspect for me (ofc its very opinable)
tbh the last video I’ve watched from fern was basically an undisclosed 15min mc donalds advertisement… I don’t known how much educational the channel is after it got sold
Youtube actually experimented using a neural upscaler on shorts a while back but they got some backlash and reverted it https://www.androidauthority.com/youtube-shorts-upscaling-experiment-3591230/
For whoever need this: this show is called “The! Iron-Armed! DASH!!” but I’ve never found this episode for download anywhere :(
…and this table would still work, since you could write this in that empty square at the bottom!
honestly I don’t think they’re going on a witch hunt here, I think they’re putting this in their term of use so that they can take projects down if some issue arises…
the meme is that, for some weird reason, Aliexpress is constantly pushing this product to the top of its homepage
not answering you, but for people having doubts after reading your reply: please translate it yourself because its not just that, there’s 1984 stuff like this inside:
Parents or other guardians of minors shall, in accordance with the law, fulfill their responsibilities for family education, educate and guide minors to love the Communist Party of China
I think the problem is that all the global “fat” supply has gone into palm oil since it’s low cost and tastes nice, so the scale of it’s production make the problem worse…
so even if the alternatives are worse on paper, splitting the production between them could mitigate the damage maybe?
btw I found this quite comprehensive study
If you read the article ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3719027.3765062 ) they are testing this in an EXTREMELY controlled enviroment and directed subjects… I have my doubts that this could provide any insight on whether this is even feaseble for public surveillance, let alone effective…
are they actually loosing any sensible userbase across all windows versions though? from statcounter I fail to see that, what stats do you guy usually look up too?
fyi I live in one of those places and giving “discounts for cash” is illegal (It does happen anyway) and “nah, we won’t take CC at all” is also illegal… so yeah…
Jokes aside, I think you picked the source ctrl where this would cause the least damage, I’ve “pushed” a lot of lost commits to my colleagues :)
you just made me realize that Fossify icon color can be changed
But I’m also scared. Not of the tech itself, but of what happens when capitalists decide to fully automate labor.
Dont worry that’s not gonna happen. A collegue of mine use llms regularly for code reviews, but you have to put in the work to understand whether what they say makes sense and filter out false positives which are not occasional.
Thanks, that’s actually interesting. I’ve found making #5 work with limited human resources / deadlines challenging, and wondered what to do. My answer in the past has been to lower review quality (reviewing faster) while keeping #5.
In my case the priority for reviews was high, but we were limited by the reviewers/developers ratio since most people would not do reviews…
The problem of deciding what should be merged or blocked
If you want to merge something and I read it over and reject the PR because you forgot about concurrency, that doesn’t mean you don’t get to merge, it means that it’s not finished baking. And assuming you give a shit about the code your response should be “oh shit, lemme fix that and resubmit” OR “actually this code will never have concurrent access, and here’s why.” You’re making this process sound adversarial when it isn’t. It’s a group effort. Everyone wins or loses together.
You’re obviously right, you’re misunderstanding me. With blocked I didn’t meant “forever”, I meant until the issues is discussed. I’m merely asking how the reviewer is making the call on what should be addressed before merge in #5
If there is work that needs to be done, and you are asked to do it, the code will be merged when it’s right. I don’t decide what to merge, I decide when something is ready to merge.
you’re really nitpicking my English, which I know is not great, but yeah that’s what I was asking, so you use #5 with a single person making the final call on when something is ready.
You’re making this process sound adversarial when it isn’t.
Absolutely not, I’ve never said or thought that. But of course development is made of people and computers can only tell you what compiles, not “when it’s right” as you say. So of course I’m more curious to understand how to solve situations when you do have conflict, if you don’t it’s easy.
If you can digest a 17k lines of code from someone else in 1 week you’re either delusional or a beautiful mind, I would close such PR immediately but it would still ruin my day